International Journal of Infectious Diseases (Nov 2024)

Suppressed HIV antibody responses following exposure to antiretrovirals—evidence from PrEP randomized trials and early antiretroviral treatment initiation studies

  • Vivian I. Avelino-Silva,
  • Mars Stone,
  • Sonia Bakkour,
  • Clara Di Germanio,
  • Michael Schmidt,
  • Ashtyn L. Conway,
  • David Wright,
  • Eduard Grebe,
  • Brian Custer,
  • Steven H. Kleinman,
  • Xutao Deng,
  • Jairam R. Lingappa,
  • Patricia Defechereux,
  • Megha Mehrotra,
  • Robert M. Grant,
  • Sandhya Vasan,
  • Shelley Facente,
  • Nittaya Phanuphak,
  • Carlo Sacdalan,
  • Siriwat Akapirat,
  • Mark de Souza,
  • Michael P. Busch,
  • Philip J. Norris

Journal volume & issue
Vol. 148
p. 107222

Abstract

Read online

Background: Exposure to antiretrovirals at or early after HIV acquisition can suppress viral replication and blunt antibody (Ab) responses; a reduced HIV detectability could impact diagnosis and blood donation screening. Methods: We used three antigen (Ag)/Ab assays and one nucleic acid test (NAT) to analyze samples collected in pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) trials (iPrEx; Partners PrEP) before infection detection by Ab-only rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs), and in early antiretroviral treatment (ART) initiation studies (RV254; SIPP). Results: Reactivity using NAT and Ag/Ab assays in samples collected up to 8 weeks prior to the first reactive RDT from 251 PrEP trials participants varied between 49-61% for active PrEP users and between 27-37% for placebo users. Among RV254 participants, reactivity in Ag/Ab assays was <100% at all timepoints, and lower among those initiating ART earlier. Seroreversions occurred for 29% (16/55), and blood donation screening with NAT and Ag/Ab assays could have missed up to 36% (20/55) of RV254 participants. For SIPP participants, who started ART at later timepoints, Ag/Ab assays identified infections with no evidence of reactivity waning. Conclusion: PrEP and early ART initiation can delay or reduce HIV detectability. Considerations for the implementation of NAT and Ag/Ab tests in PrEP/PEP programs relying on Ab-only RDTs should be balanced according to feasibility and public health impact. While blood transfusion services using Ab-only RDTs for HIV screening should adopt higher sensitivity tests, surveillance and further research are needed to determine the need for novel HIV testing algorithms for those already using NAT and Ag/Ab screening assays.

Keywords