A study of patient‐reported pain during bone marrow aspiration and biopsy using local anesthesia alone compared with local anesthesia with intravenous midazolam coadministration at a tertiary academic hospital in South Africa

Abstract

Abstract Introduction During the bone marrow aspiration and biopsy (BMAB) procedure, patients report pain of widely variable intensity. There is limited literature on the factors associated with the pain. The use of local anesthesia (LA) only is still widespread although it does not abolish the pain. Midazolam is the most commonly used benzodiazepine for conscious sedation. Our center introduced universal midazolam sedation unless there is a contraindication to its use, 4 years ago. This study assessed the impact of the universal use of intravenous midazolam for BMAB compared to use of LA only. The factors associated with the pain of BMAB, were analyzed. Methods A retrospective cross‐sectional study was performed on adult patients who had a BMAB procedure from July 1, 2018 to March 30, 2019. A questionnaire incorporating a visual analog pain scale, was used for data collection. Results A total of 182 BMAB procedures were included in the study. Pain was reported in all procedures performed under LA and only in 29.1% of procedures performed with midazolam. Age, sex, race, level of education, body mass index (BMI), indication and diagnosis had no influence on pain. Patients who had previous BMAB experienced less pain. Experience of operator had a significant effect on pain. Midazolam dose showed a negative correlation with pain. Conclusion LA only is not enough to abolish pain of BMAB. Midazolam conscious sedation used with LA reduces pain to acceptable levels. Patients with previous experience of BMAB under midazolam premedication reported less pain. Furthermore, the experience of operator reduced the pain significantly.

Keywords

• bone marrow aspiration and biopsy
• intravenous midazolam
• local anesthesia and benzodiazepine
• patient reported pain