Frontiers in Surgery (Sep 2021)

Rotating Hinge Knee Arthroplasty for Revision Prosthetic-Knee Infection: Good Functional Outcomes but a Crucial Need for Superinfection Prevention

  • Florian Bourbotte-Salmon,
  • Tristan Ferry,
  • Tristan Ferry,
  • Tristan Ferry,
  • Tristan Ferry,
  • Mickaël Cardinale,
  • Elvire Servien,
  • Elvire Servien,
  • Elvire Servien,
  • Frédéric Rongieras,
  • Michel-Henry Fessy,
  • Michel-Henry Fessy,
  • Michel-Henry Fessy,
  • Antoine Bertani,
  • Frédéric Laurent,
  • Frédéric Laurent,
  • Frédéric Laurent,
  • Margaux Buffe-Lidove,
  • Cécile Batailler,
  • Cécile Batailler,
  • Cécile Batailler,
  • Sébastien Lustig,
  • Sébastien Lustig,
  • Sébastien Lustig,
  • The Lyon Bone and Joint Infections Study Group

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2021.551814
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 8

Abstract

Read online

Introduction: Management of chronic infection following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is challenging. Rotating hinged prostheses are often required in this setting due to severe bone loss, ligamentous insufficiency, or a combination of the two. The nature of the mechanical and septic complications occurring in this setting has not been well-described. The aim of this study was to evaluate patient outcomes using a hinge knee prosthesis for prosthetic knee infections and to investigate risk factors for implant removal.Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study that included all patients treated in our tertiary level referral center between January 2009 and December 2016 for prosthetic knee infection with a hinge knee prosthesis. Only patients with a minimum 2-year of follow-up were included. Functional evaluation was performed using international knee society (IKS) “Knee” and “Function” scores. Survival analysis comparing implant removal risks for mechanical and septic causes was performed using Cox univariate analysis and Kaplan-Meier curves. Risk factors for implant removal and septic failure were assessed.Results: Forty-six knees were eligible for inclusion. The majority of patients had satisfactory functional outcomes as determined by mean IKS scores (mean knee score: 70.53, mean function score: 46.53 points, and mean knee flexion: 88.75°). The 2-year implant survival rate was 89% but dropped to 65% at 7 years follow-up. The risk of failure (i.e., implant removal) was higher for septic etiology compared to mechanical causes. Patients with American society of anesthesiologists (ASA) score>1, immunosuppression, or with peripheral arterial diseases had a higher risk for septic failure. Patients with acute infection according to the Tsukayamaclassification had a higher risk of failure. Of the 46 patients included, 19 (41.3%) had atleast one infectious event on the surgical knee and most of these were superinfections (14/19) with new pathogens isolated. Among pathogens responsible for superinfections (i) cefazolin and gentamicin were both active in six of the cases but failed to prevent the superinfection; (ii) cefazolin and/or gentamicin were not active in eight patients, leading to alternative systemic and/or local antimicrobial prophylaxis consideration.Conclusions: Patients with chronic total knee arthroplasty (TKA) infection, requiring revision using rotating hinge implant, had good functional outcomes but experienced a high rate of septic failure, mostly due to bacterial superinfection. These patients may need optimal antimicrobial systemic prophylaxis and innovative approaches to reduce the rate of superinfection.

Keywords