Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, United States; Department of Biology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, United States
Malte Roerden
Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, United States
Department of Biology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, United States
Coralie M Backlund
Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, United States; Department of Biological Engineering, MIT, Cambridge, United States
Nory G Klop-Packel
Department of Biology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, United States
Tanaka Remba
Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, United States
Department of Biology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, United States; Department of Biological Engineering, MIT, Cambridge, United States; Ragon Institute of MGH, MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, United States
Darrell J Irvine
Department of Biology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, United States; Department of Biological Engineering, MIT, Cambridge, United States; Ragon Institute of MGH, MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, United States
Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, United States; Department of Biology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, United States; Ragon Institute of MGH, MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, United States; Ludwig Center at MIT’s Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, Cambridge, United States
Cancer immunotherapies, in particular checkpoint blockade immunotherapy (CBT), can induce control of cancer growth, with a fraction of patients experiencing durable responses. However, the majority of patients currently do not respond to CBT and the molecular determinants of resistance have not been fully elucidated. Mounting clinical evidence suggests that the clonal status of neoantigens (NeoAg) impacts the anti-tumor T cell response. High intratumor heterogeneity (ITH), where the majority of NeoAgs are expressed subclonally, is correlated with poor clinical response to CBT and poor infiltration with tumor-reactive T cells. However, the mechanism by which ITH blunts tumor-reactive T cells is unclear. We developed a transplantable murine lung cancer model to characterize the immune response against a defined set of NeoAgs expressed either clonally or subclonally to model low or high ITH, respectively. Here we show that clonal expression of a weakly immunogenic NeoAg with a relatively strong NeoAg increased the immunogenicity of tumors with low but not high ITH. Mechanistically we determined that clonal NeoAg expression allowed cross-presenting dendritic cells to acquire and present both NeoAgs. Dual NeoAg presentation by dendritic cells was associated with a more mature DC phenotype and a higher stimulatory capacity. These data suggest that clonal NeoAg expression can induce more potent anti-tumor responses due to more stimulatory dendritic cell:T cell interactions. Therapeutic vaccination targeting subclonally expressed NeoAgs could be used to boost anti-tumor T cell responses.