International Journal of General Medicine (Mar 2023)
Prognostic Value of the Lung Immune Prognostic Index for Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients: A Chinese Cohort Study
Abstract
Jing Huang,1,2,* Hongjiang Pu,3,* Jintao He,4 Xiaohu Tang5 1The First Clinical Medical College, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, People’s Republic of China; 2Department of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Yunnan Cancer Hospital, Yunnan Cancer Centre, Kunming, People’s Republic of China; 3Department of Oncology, Dazhou Central Hospital, Dazhou, Sichuan, People’s Republic of China; 4Kunming Medical University, Kunming, People’s Republic of China; 5Department of Rheumatology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Yunnan University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Kunming, People’s Republic of China*These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Xiaohu Tang, Department of Rheumatology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Yunnan University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, 120 Guanghua Street, Wuhua District, Kunming, 650032, People’s Republic of China, Tel/Fax +86-871-63639262, Email [email protected]: Most cancer-related deaths around the globe are caused by lung cancer. The present treatments for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) are cytotoxic chemotherapy (CCT), targeted therapy (TT) and immunotherapy, but the benefit of the same regime varies greatly. Hence, it is important to identify biomarkers to predict the efficacy of modalities. Previous literature suggested certain parameters might be predictive factors. Nevertheless, the utility of these parameters is limited due to the types of solid tumors.Purpose: The study aimed to examine whether the lung immune prognostic index (LIPI) was related to outcomes of CCT, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and TT for mNSCLC patients.Materials and Methods: A retrospective cohort study between September 2012 and May 2020 was conducted on 350 Chinese mNSCLC patients, including 147 patients receiving ICIs, 103 TT, and 100 CCT. The data were examined to analyze the prognostic value of LIPI among various treatments.Main Outcomes and Measures: The associations between PFS and good, intermediate, or poor prognostic LIPI scores in ICIs, TT, and CCT were determined, respectively.Results: In univariable analyses, there was a relevance between a good LIPI score and better PFS among patients receiving ICIs (HR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.44– 1.51), TT (HR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.16– 1.74), and CCT (HR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.19– 0.80). In multivariable analyses, the intermediate LIPI score was linked to better PFS only in patients receiving TT (HR, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.17– 0.92) rather than ICIs (HR, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.66– 2.45) or CCT (HR, 1.24; 95% CI, 0.49– 4.55).Conclusion: Baseline LIPI value is an important prognostic biomarker for mNSCLC patients treated with TT. Shorter PFS with TT was associated with poor baseline LIPI. Poor LIPI score may be considered as a promising indicator showing which patients are unlikely to respond well to TT. The prognostic value of LIPI can be more clearly determined through prospective clinical study.Keywords: lung immune prognostic index, metastatic non-small cell lung cancer, prognostic value
