Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology (Apr 2022)

Galvanic vestibular‐evoked myogenic potentials in evaluating damaged sites of vestibular neuritis

  • Chih‐Ming Chang,
  • Wu‐Chia Lo,
  • Yi‐Ho Young,
  • Li‐Jen Liao,
  • Po‐Hsuan Wu,
  • Ping‐Chia Cheng,
  • Po‐Wen Cheng

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/lio2.745
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 7, no. 2
pp. 506 – 514

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Objectives To test the possibility of pure otolithic organ deficits and validate the histopathological evidence of retrovestibular neural impairment in vestibular neuritis (VN), the authors adopted a topographic survey combining cervical vestibular‐evoked myogenic potential (cVEMP) and ocular vestibular‐evoked myogenic potential (oVEMP) using various stimulation modes and caloric tests. Methods Forty patients with VN were enrolled in this study. All patients underwent pure tone audiometry, acoustic cVEMP, galvanic cVEMP, vibratory oVEMP, galvanic oVEMP, and caloric tests. Different combinations of vestibular tests were further compared and analyzed. Results According to vestibular test results in affected VN ears, the proportion (10%) of pure saccular dysfunction was significantly less than that (52.5%) of saccular nerve deficit. The proportion (2.5%) of pure utricular dysfunction was significantly less than that (37.5%) of utricular nerve deficit. The percentage (82.5%) of VN involving the ampullar vestibulo‐ocular reflex (VOR) pathway was significantly higher than that (40%) involving the utriculo‐ocular reflex (UOR) pathway. The superior, inferior, and total VN percentages were 37.5%, 17.5%, and 45%, respectively. The proportion of inferior VN was significantly less than that of VN involving the superior vestibular nerve. Conclusion There were significantly fewer cases of pure otolithic organ dysfunction than vestibular nerve involvement in VN patients. The damage to the ampullar VOR pathway was more significant than that to the UOR pathway, and both pathways might be independent of each other. In addition, the incidence of isolated inferior VN was significantly less than that of VN involving the superior vestibular nerve. Level of Evidence Level 3.

Keywords