Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery (Mar 2006)
Ultrafiltração convencional com modificação técnica no tratamento cirúrgico dos defeitos cardíacos congênitos Conventional ultrafiltration with technical modification in congenital heart defect surgery
Abstract
OBJETIVO: Comparar pacientes submetidos à ultrafiltração convencional (UFC), sem e com modificação técnica que permite aproveitamento do sangue residual do circuito de tubos e do oxigenador. MÉTODO: No período de março de 2002 a janeiro de 2005, 301 pacientes submetidos à correção de cardiopatias congênitas com circulação extracorpórea (CEC) foram analisados, retrospectivamente, e divididos em dois grupos: A - constituído de 130 pacientes submetidos à UFC clássica e grupo B - constituído de 171 pacientes submetidos à UFC com modificação técnica para aproveitamento do sangue residual. Foram comparadas variáveis demográficas, diagnóstico, tratamento cirúrgico, dados do período intra-operatório e pós- operatório, necessidade e volume de transfusões, exames laboratoriais e permanência hospitalar. RESULTADOS: Não houve diferença no valor inicial de hematócrito antes da CEC (p = 0,06), mas no grupo B, os valores após a ultrafiltração foram maiores (p OBJECTIVE: To compare patients submitted to the conventional ultrafiltration (CUF) with and without a technical modification that allows use of residual blood from the circuit tubes and oxygenator. METHOD: From March 2002 to January 2005, 301 patients undergoing to congenital heart defects surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) were retrospectively analyzed and divided in two groups: Group A - 130 submitted to CUF and Group B, 171 patients submitted to CUF with a technical modification that uses residual blood. Demographic data, diagnosis, surgical treatment, intra-operative and postoperative data, the need and amount of blood transfusions, laboratorial results and length of hospital stay were compared between the groups. RESULTS: There was no differences in the initial hematocrit before CPB (p = 0.06), but in the Group B, the values after ultrafiltration were higher (p <0.0001). Group B patients received more transfusions in the first 48 hours of the postoperative period (p <0.0001). There was no signicant difference in the time of mechanical ventilation (p = 0.34), but the inotropic support (p <0.0001), antibiotic therapy (p = 0.0006), length of stay in the intensive care unit (p <0.0001) and length of hospital stay (p <0.0001) were greater for Group B. CONCLUSIONS: CUF with the technical modification was not better than conventional CUF, because in spite of elevating the hematocrit after the CBP, it caused greater postoperative bleeding with a greater need of blood transfusions and longer hospitalar stays.
Keywords