PLoS ONE (Jan 2019)

Ultrasound detection of incidental diffuse parotid disease: A single-center study.

  • Do Hun Kim,
  • Dong Wook Kim,
  • Jin Young Park,
  • Yoo Jin Lee,
  • Hye Jung Choo,
  • Tae Kwun Ha,
  • Soo Jin Jung,
  • Ji Sun Park,
  • Sung Ho Moon,
  • Ki Jung Ahn,
  • Hye Jin Baek

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0219308
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 14, no. 7
p. e0219308

Abstract

Read online

In this study, we compared ultrasound (US) features between normal parotid parenchyma (NPP) and incidental diffuse parotid disease (DPD). From January 2008 to December 2017, 180 patients underwent neck US before parotid surgery at our hospital. From these, 82 were excluded because of the lack of histopathological data concerning the parotid parenchyma or inadequate US images. A single radiologist blinded to the clinicoserological data and histopathological results, retrospectively investigated all US features and categorizations for the parotid glands using a picture archiving and communication system. Retrospective histopathological analysis of the parotid parenchyma was performed by a single pathologist. On the basis of the histopathological analyses, the 98 patients were divided into NPP (n = 70) and DPD (n = 28) groups. Among US features, parenchymal echogenicity and echotexture showed statistically significant differences between the two groups (p 0.05). The US-based categorization significantly differentiated between NPP and DPD (p < 0.0001), and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis revealed that US categorization based on ≥2 abnormal US features showed the best diagnostic performance for detecting DPD. Thus, US can aid in differentiating DPD from NPP.