Is There a Difference in Mid-Palatal Suture Density after Rapid Maxillary Expansion, Surgically Assisted Rapid Maxillary Expansion, and Miniscrew-Assisted Rapid Palatal Expansion? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Abstract

The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the density of the midpalatal suture (MPS) of individuals with maxillary expansion (rapid maxillary expansion, RME), surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion (SARPE), and miniscrew-assisted rapid palatal expansion (MARPE) through computed tomography. An electronic search was performed in four databases, MEDLINE via PubMed, SCOPUS, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in February 2023 and updated in April 2023, using previously established search strategies. Studies were retrieved without restrictions in terms of data, language, or publication status. The risk of bias assessment was based on a quality assessment tool for before-and-after studies. Ten studies were included in our systematic review, and nine studies were included for our quantitative analysis. The analyses were performed by subgroup according to the evaluation of the region, anterior, middle, and posterior, including the three types of treatment: RME, SARPE, and MARPE. Heterogeneity was high for the three regions (anterior 95%, medium 97%, and posterior 84%) and a statistical difference was found in two of the three regions (anterior p = 0.06, medium p = 0.031, and posterior p < 0.001). There is not enough evidence to state that the MPS density is different after 6 months of RME in the anterior and middle regions; the bone density values for SARPE and MARPE suggest that 6 or 7 months after expansion, there is still no bone density similar to the initial one in the three regions.

Keywords

• bone density
• palatal expansion technique
• computed tomography