International Journal of Population Data Science (Sep 2023)

Essential requirements for the governance and management of data trusts, data repositories, and other data collaborations

  • P Alison Paprica,
  • Monique Crichlow,
  • Donna Curtis Maillet,
  • Sarah Kesselring,
  • Conrad Pow,
  • Thomas P. Scarnecchia,
  • Michael J. Schull,
  • Rosario G. Cartagena ,
  • Annabelle Cumyn,
  • Salman Dostmohammad,
  • Keith O. Elliston,
  • Michelle Greiver,
  • Amy Hawn Nelson,
  • Sean L. Hill,
  • Wanrudee Isaranuwatchai,
  • Evgueni Loukipoudis,
  • James Ted McDonald,
  • John R. McLaughlin,
  • Alan Rabinowitz,
  • Fahad Razak,
  • Stefaan G. Verhulst,
  • Amol A. Verma,
  • J. Charles Victor,
  • Andrew Young,
  • Joanna Yu,
  • Kimberlyn McGrail

DOI
https://doi.org/10.23889/ijpds.v8i4.2142
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 8, no. 4

Abstract

Read online

Introduction Around the world, many organisations are working on ways to increase the use, sharing, and reuse of person-level data for research, evaluation, planning, and innovation while ensuring that data are secure and privacy is protected. As a contribution to broader efforts to improve data governance and management, in 2020 members of our team published 12 minimum specification essential requirements (min specs) to provide practical guidance for organisations establishing or operating data trusts and other forms of data infrastructure. Approach and Aims We convened an international team, consisting mostly of participants from Canada and the United States of America, to test and refine the original 12 min specs. Twenty-three (23) data-focused organisations and initiatives recorded the various ways they address the min specs. Sub-teams analysed the results, used the findings to make improvements to the min specs, and identified materials to support organisations/initiatives in addressing the min specs. Results Analyses and discussion led to an updated set of 15 min specs covering five categories: one min spec for Legal, five for Governance, four for Management, two for Data Users, and three for Stakeholder & Public Engagement. Multiple changes were made to make the min specs language more technically complete and precise. The updated set of 15 min specs has been integrated into a Canadian national standard that, to our knowledge, is the first to include requirements for public engagement and Indigenous Data Sovereignty. Conclusions The testing and refinement of the min specs led to significant additions and improvements. The min specs helped the 23 organisations/initiatives involved in this project communicate and compare how they achieve responsible and trustworthy data governance and management. By extension, the min specs, and the Canadian national standard based on them, are likely to be useful for other data-focused organisations and initiatives.

Keywords