Water (May 2014)

Water, Sanitation and Hygiene Conditions in Kenyan Rural Schools: Are Schools Meeting the Needs of Menstruating Girls?

  • Kelly T. Alexander,
  • Clifford Oduor,
  • Elizabeth Nyothach,
  • Kayla F. Laserson,
  • Nyaguara Amek,
  • Alie Eleveld,
  • Linda Mason,
  • Richard Rheingans,
  • Caryl Beynon,
  • Aisha Mohammed,
  • Maurice Ombok,
  • David Obor,
  • Frank Odhiambo,
  • Robert Quick,
  • Penelope A. Phillips-Howard

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/w6051453
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 6, no. 5
pp. 1453 – 1466

Abstract

Read online

Water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) programs in African schools have received increased attention, particularly around the potential impact of poor menstrual hygiene management (MHM) on equity for girls’ education. This study was conducted prior to a menstrual feasibility study in rural Kenya, to examine current WASH in primary schools and the resources available for menstruating schoolgirls. Cross-sectional surveys were performed in 62 primary schools during unannounced visits. Of these, 60% had handwashing water, 13% had washing water in latrines for menstruating girls, and 2% had soap. Latrines were structurally sound and 16% were clean. Most schools (84%) had separate latrines for girls, but the majority (77%) had no lock. Non-governmental organizations (NGOs) supported WASH in 76% of schools. Schools receiving WASH interventions were more likely to have: cleaner latrines (Risk Ratio (RR) 1.5; 95% Confidence Intervals [CI] 1.0, 2.1), handwashing facilities (RR 1.6, CI 1.1, 2.5), handwashing water (RR 2.7; CI 1.4, 5.2), and water in girls’ latrines (RR 4.0; CI 1.4, 11.6). Schools continue to lack essential WASH facilities for menstruating girls. While external support for school WASH interventions improved MHM quality, the impact of these contributions remains insufficient. Further support is required to meet international recommendations for healthy, gender-equitable schools.

Keywords