BMJ Open (Oct 2021)

Reliability and validity of a Spanish-language measure assessing clinical capacity to sustain Paediatric Early Warning Systems (PEWS) in resource-limited hospitals

  • Douglas Luke,
  • Dylan Graetz,
  • Asya Agulnik,
  • Erika Montalvo,
  • Virginia McKay,
  • Sara Malone,
  • Maria Puerto-Torres,
  • Alejandra Gonzalez-Ruiz,
  • Yuvanesh Vedaraju,
  • Huiqi Wang,
  • Kim Prewitt,
  • Cesar Villegas,
  • Adolfo Cardenas-Aguierre,
  • Carlos Acuna,
  • Ana Edith Arana,
  • Rosdali Díaz,
  • Silvana Espinoza,
  • Karla Guerrero,
  • Angélica Martínez,
  • Alejandra Mendez,
  • Dora Soberanis,
  • Antonella Torelli,
  • Janeth Quelal,
  • Erika Villanueva,
  • Meenakshi Devidas,
  • Lupe Mora,
  • Mariuxy Barragán,
  • Rosario Pereda,
  • Roxana Morales,
  • Cinthia Hernandez,
  • Jocelyn Mijares,
  • Eduardo Pineda,
  • Sheybi Miralda,
  • Miriam Armenta

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053116
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 11, no. 10

Abstract

Read online

Background Paediatric Early Warning Systems (PEWSs) improve identification of deterioration, however, their sustainability has not been studied. Sustainability is critical to maximise impact of interventions like PEWS, particularly in low-resource settings. This study establishes the reliability and validity of a Spanish-language Clinical Sustainability Assessment Tool (CSAT) to assess clinical capacity to sustain interventions in resource-limited hospitals.Methods Participants included PEWS implementation leadership teams of 29 paediatric cancer centres in Latin America involved in a collaborative to implement PEWS. The CSAT, a sustainability assessment tool validated in high-resource settings, was translated into Spanish and distributed to participants as an anonymous electronic survey. Psychometric, confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), and multivariate analyses were preformed to assess reliability, structure and initial validity. Focus groups were conducted after participants reviewed CSAT reports to assess their interpretation and utility.Results The CSAT survey achieved an 80% response rate (n=169) with a mean score of 4.4 (of 5; 3.8–4.8 among centres). The CSAT had good reliability with an average internal consistency of 0.77 (95% CI 0.71 to 0.81); and CFAs supported the seven-domain structure. CSAT results were associated with respondents’ perceptions of the evidence for PEWS, its implementation and use in their centre, and their assessment of the hospital culture and implementation climate. The mean CSAT score was higher among respondents at centres with longer time using PEWS (p<0.001). Focus group participants noted the CSAT report helped assess their centre’s clinical capacity to sustain PEWS and provided constructive feedback for improvement.Conclusions We present information supporting the reliability and validity of the CSAT tool, the first Spanish-language instrument to assess clinical capacity to sustain evidence-based interventions in hospitals of variable resource levels. This assessment demonstrates a high capacity to sustain PEWS in these resource-limited centres with improvement over time from PEWS implementation.