Transplant International (Oct 2023)

Validated Prognostic Scores to Predict Outcomes in ECLS-Bridged Patients to Lung Transplantation

  • Eleonora Faccioli,
  • Eleonora Faccioli,
  • Giulia Lorenzoni,
  • Didier Schneiter,
  • Andrea Dell’Amore,
  • Sven Hillinger,
  • Marco Schiavon,
  • Claudio Caviezel,
  • Dario Gregori,
  • Federico Rea,
  • Isabelle Opitz,
  • Ilhan Inci

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/ti.2023.11609
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 36

Abstract

Read online

Selection of patients who may benefit from extracorporeal life support (ECLS) as a bridge to lung transplant (LTx) is crucial. The aim was to assess if validated prognostic scores could help in selecting patients who may benefit from ECLS-bridging predicting their outcomes. Clinical data of patients successfully ECLS-bridged to LTx from 2009 to 2021 were collected from two European centers. For each patient, we calculated Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA), Simplified Acute Physiology Score III (SAPS III), Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II), before placing ECLS support, and then correlated with outcome. Median values of SOFA, SAPS III, and APACHE II were 5 (IQR 3–9), 57 (IQR 47.5–65), and 21 (IQR 15–26). In-hospital, 30 and 90 days mortality were 21%, 14%, and 22%. SOFA, SAPS III, and APACHE II were analyzed as predictors of in-hospital, 30 and 90 days mortality (SOFA C-Index: 0.67, 0.78, 0.72; SAPS III C-index: 0.48, 0.45, 0.51; APACHE II C-Index: 0.49, 0.45, 0.52). For SOFA, the score with the best performance, a value ≥9 was identified to be the optimal cut-off for the prediction of the outcomes of interest. SOFA may be considered an adequate predictor in these patients, helping clinical decision-making. More specific and simplified scores for this population are necessary.

Keywords