Clinical and Translational Allergy (Oct 2024)

Recurrent tick bites induce high IgG1 antibody responses to α‐Gal in sensitized and non‐sensitized forestry employees in Luxembourg

  • Neera Chakrapani,
  • Kyra Swiontek,
  • Judith M. Hübschen,
  • Jörg Fischer,
  • Maria Ruiz‐Castell,
  • Francoise Codreanu‐Morel,
  • Farah Hannachi,
  • Martine Morisset,
  • Markus Ollert,
  • Annette Kuehn,
  • Claude P. Muller,
  • Christiane Hilger

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/clt2.12396
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 14, no. 10
pp. n/a – n/a

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background The α‐Gal syndrome (AGS) is characterized by the presence of specific IgE‐antibodies to the carbohydrate galactose‐α‐1,3‐galactose (α‐Gal). Sensitization to α‐Gal has been associated with tick bites and individuals exposed to ticks have an elevated risk of sensitization. The aim of this study was to analyze IgG and IgE antibody responses to α‐Gal in a high‐risk cohort of forestry employees (FE) in Luxembourg. Methods Questionnaires and serum samples of FE from Luxembourg (n = 219) were retrospectively analyzed. α‐Gal specific IgE was quantified by ImmunoCAP, α‐Gal specific IgG and subclasses IgG1–4 were determined by ELISA. Additionally, sera from population‐based controls (n = 150) and two groups of food‐allergic patients, patients with AGS (n = 45) and fish‐allergic patients (n = 22) were assessed for IgG antibody responses to α‐Gal and cod extract. Results Twenty‐one percent of FE was sensitized to α‐Gal (sIgE ≥ 0.1 kUA/L). Both sensitized and non‐sensitized FE exhibited high levels of α‐Gal specific IgG, IgG1 and IgG3 compared with controls, indicating a stimulation of IgG responses by recurrent tick bites, independent of the sensitization status. AGS patients had the highest levels of IgG1 and IgG2 antibodies, whereas the profile of fish‐allergic patients was similar to the profile of the controls for which anti‐α‐Gal responses were dominated by IgG2 antibodies. α‐Gal sIgG4 levels were either very low or undetectable in all groups. Conclusion Our study provides evidence for a continuous stimulation of α‐Gal related immune responses by repeated tick bites, translating into highly elevated levels of IgG1 antibodies directed against α‐Gal.

Keywords