PLoS ONE (Jan 2013)

Comparative efficacy and safety of deferoxamine, deferiprone and deferasirox on severe thalassemia: a meta-analysis of 16 randomized controlled trials.

  • Sujian Xia,
  • Weidong Zhang,
  • Liting Huang,
  • Hong Jiang

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0082662
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 8, no. 12
p. e82662

Abstract

Read online

ObjectiveA meta-analysis was conducted to investigate the efficacy and safety of three main iron chelators, namely, deferoxamine (DFO), deferiprone (DFP) and deferasirox (DFX) for thalassemia major (TM) patients.MethodsRandomized controlled trials comparing mono-therapy DFO, DFP, DFX and combined DFP with DFO therapy in TM patients from January 1990 to December 2012 were searched and selected. Two independent authors assessed data from extracted randomized trials for efficacy and safety in the measurements of serum ferritin (SF), live iron concentration (LIC), myocardial iron content (MIC), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and adverse events (AEs).ResultsSixteen studies were selected. In the comparison of DFP versus DFO treatment groups, a significant difference was revealed on MIC and LVEF (P=0.01 and P=0.007, respectively) but not on SF or LIC level (P=0.65 and P=0.37, respectively). In comparing combined therapy (DFP plus DFO) versus DFO, a significant difference was shown on MIC and LVEF measurements (PConclusionFindings indicated that the most effective and safe iron chelators remains to be proven, and further large-scale, long-term studies are needed.