Frontiers in Endocrinology (Feb 2021)

G Protein-Coupled Estrogen Receptor Correlates With Dkk2 Expression and Has Prognostic Impact in Ovarian Cancer Patients

  • Patricia Fraungruber,
  • Till Kaltofen,
  • Sabine Heublein,
  • Sabine Heublein,
  • Christina Kuhn,
  • Doris Mayr,
  • Alexander Burges,
  • Sven Mahner,
  • Philipp Rathert,
  • Udo Jeschke,
  • Udo Jeschke,
  • Fabian Trillsch

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2021.564002
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 12

Abstract

Read online

PurposeWnt pathway modulator Dickkopf 2 (Dkk2) and signaling of the G protein-coupled estrogen receptor (GPER) seem to have essential functions in numerous cancer types. For epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), it has not been proven if either Dkk2 or the GPER on its own have an independent impact on overall survival (OS). So far, the correlation of both factors and their clinical significance has not systematically been investigated before.MethodsExpression levels of Dkk2 were immunohistochemically analyzed in 156 patient samples from different histologic subtypes of EOC applying the immune-reactivity score (IRS). Expression analyses were correlated with clinical and pathological parameters to assess for prognostic relevance. Data analysis was performed using Spearman’s correlations, Kruskal-Wallis-test and Kaplan-Meier estimates.ResultsHighest Dkk2 expression of all subtypes was observed in clear cell carcinoma. In addition, Dkk2 expression differed significantly (p<0.001) between low and high grade serous ovarian cancer. A significant correlation of Dkk2 with the cytoplasmic GPER expression was noted (p=0.001) but not for the nuclear estrogen receptor alpha (ERα) or beta (ERβ). Patients exhibiting both, high expression Dkk2 (IRS>4) and GPER (IRS>8), had a significantly better overall survival compared to patients with low expression (61 months vs. 33 months; p=0.024).ConclusionDkk2 and GPER expression correlates in EOC and combined expression of both is associated with improved OS. These findings underline the clinical significance of both pathways and indicate a possible prognostic impact as well as a potential for treatment strategies addressing interactions between estrogen and Wnt signaling in ovarian cancer.

Keywords