Aqua (Jun 2021)

Intermittent water supply systems and their resilience to COVID-19: IWA IWS SG survey

  • R. Farmani,
  • Joe Dalton,
  • Bambos Charalambous,
  • Elizabeth Lawson,
  • Sarah Bunney,
  • Sarah Cotterill

DOI
https://doi.org/10.2166/aqua.2021.009
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 70, no. 4
pp. 507 – 520

Abstract

Read online

There is limited information about the current state of intermittent water supply (IWS) systems at the global level. A survey was carried out by the Intermittent Water Supply Specialist Group of the International Water Association (IWA IWS SG) to better understand the current state of these systems and challenges that water companies may have faced under COVID-19 pandemic and to capture successful management strategies applied by water utilities. The survey consisted of three parts: (1) general information about IWS systems, (2) current state of IWS and (3) resilience of IWS under COVID-19 conditions, as well as some questions about potential interventions in order to improve system performance in general and under future uncertain conditions. The survey responses were evaluated based on the Safe & SuRe resilience framework, assessing measures of mitigation, adaptation, coping and learning, and exploring organisational and operational responses of IWS utilities. Infrastructure capacity and water resources availability were identified as the main causes of intermittency in most water distribution systems, while intermittent electricity was considered as the main external cause. Participants indicated that some risk assessment process was in place; however, COVID-19 has surpassed any provisions made to address the risks. Lessons learnt highlighted the importance of financial resources, e-infrastructure for efficient system operation and communication with consumers, and the critical role of international knowledge transfer and the sharing of best practice guidelines for improving resilience and transitioning towards continuous water supply. HIGHLIGHTS Impact of COVID-19 surpassed any provisions based on risk assessment approaches.; Changes in intermittent energy supply had cascading positive and negative impacts.; Inadequate infrastructure and financial strains are the main barriers to change.; Sharing knowledge and strategic guidelines can accelerate utilities' resilience.; Transition to 24/7 supply requires technical, financial and human resources support.;

Keywords