Scientific Reports (Oct 2023)

Comparing ChatGPT and GPT-4 performance in USMLE soft skill assessments

  • Dana Brin,
  • Vera Sorin,
  • Akhil Vaid,
  • Ali Soroush,
  • Benjamin S. Glicksberg,
  • Alexander W. Charney,
  • Girish Nadkarni,
  • Eyal Klang

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-43436-9
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 13, no. 1
pp. 1 – 5

Abstract

Read online

Abstract The United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) has been a subject of performance study for artificial intelligence (AI) models. However, their performance on questions involving USMLE soft skills remains unexplored. This study aimed to evaluate ChatGPT and GPT-4 on USMLE questions involving communication skills, ethics, empathy, and professionalism. We used 80 USMLE-style questions involving soft skills, taken from the USMLE website and the AMBOSS question bank. A follow-up query was used to assess the models’ consistency. The performance of the AI models was compared to that of previous AMBOSS users. GPT-4 outperformed ChatGPT, correctly answering 90% compared to ChatGPT’s 62.5%. GPT-4 showed more confidence, not revising any responses, while ChatGPT modified its original answers 82.5% of the time. The performance of GPT-4 was higher than that of AMBOSS's past users. Both AI models, notably GPT-4, showed capacity for empathy, indicating AI's potential to meet the complex interpersonal, ethical, and professional demands intrinsic to the practice of medicine.