Frontiers in Oncology (Jul 2022)

Implementing Pharmacogenetic Testing in Gastrointestinal Cancers (IMPACT-GI): Study Protocol for a Pragmatic Implementation Trial for Establishing DPYD and UGT1A1 Screening to Guide Chemotherapy Dosing

  • Lisa A. Varughese,
  • Madhuri Bhupathiraju,
  • Glenda Hoffecker,
  • Shannon Terek,
  • Margaret Harr,
  • Hakon Hakonarson,
  • Christine Cambareri,
  • Jessica Marini,
  • Jeffrey Landgraf,
  • Jinbo Chen,
  • Genevieve Kanter,
  • Kelsey S. Lau-Min,
  • Ryan C. Massa,
  • Nevena Damjanov,
  • Nandi J. Reddy,
  • Randall A. Oyer,
  • Ursina R. Teitelbaum,
  • Sony Tuteja

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.859846
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 12

Abstract

Read online

BackgroundFluoropyrimidines (fluorouracil [5-FU], capecitabine) and irinotecan are commonly prescribed chemotherapy agents for gastrointestinal (GI) malignancies. Pharmacogenetic (PGx) testing for germline DPYD and UGT1A1 variants associated with reduced enzyme activity holds the potential to identify patients at high risk for severe chemotherapy-induced toxicity. Slow adoption of PGx testing in routine clinical care is due to implementation barriers, including long test turnaround times, lack of integration in the electronic health record (EHR), and ambiguity in test cost coverage. We sought to establish PGx testing in our health system following the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, Sustainment (EPIS) framework as a guide. Our implementation study aims to address barriers to PGx testing.MethodsThe Implementing Pharmacogenetic Testing in Gastrointestinal Cancers (IMPACT-GI) study is a non-randomized, pragmatic, open-label implementation study at three sites within a major academic health system. Eligible patients with a GI malignancy indicated for treatment with 5-FU, capecitabine, or irinotecan will undergo PGx testing prior to chemotherapy initiation. Specimens will be sent to an academic clinical laboratory followed by return of results in the EHR with appropriate clinical decision support for the care team. We hypothesize that the availability of a rapid turnaround PGx test with specific dosing recommendations will increase PGx test utilization to guide pharmacotherapy decisions and improve patient safety outcomes. Primary implementation endpoints are feasibility, fidelity, and penetrance. Exploratory analyses for clinical effectiveness of genotyping will include assessing grade ≥3 treatment-related toxicity using available clinical data, patient-reported outcomes, and quality of life measures.ConclusionWe describe the formative work conducted to prepare our health system for DPYD and UGT1A1 testing. Our prospective implementation study will evaluate the clinical implementation of this testing program and create the infrastructure necessary to ensure sustainability of PGx testing in our health system. The results of this study may help other institutions interested in implementing PGx testing in oncology care.Clinical Trial Registrationhttps://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04736472, identifier [NCT04736472].

Keywords