Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems (Apr 2024)

Lawsonite and Garnet Oxygen Isotope Record of Fluid‐Rock Interaction During Subduction

  • Patricia Kang,
  • Laure A. J. Martin,
  • Alberto Vitale Brovarone,
  • Donna L. Whitney

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GC011389
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 25, no. 4
pp. n/a – n/a

Abstract

Read online

Abstract During the subduction of an oceanic plate, fluids are released from metabasaltic crust, metasediment, and serpentinite under high‐pressure/low‐temperature conditions. Although some fluids may eventually leave the slab, some participate in metamorphic reactions within the slab during subduction and exhumation. To identify fluid sources and other controls influencing mineral composition, we report the in situ‐measured δ18O of lawsonite and garnet in blueschist‐ to eclogite‐facies rocks from 10 subduction zones that represent various field settings, including mélanges, structurally coherent terranes, and an eclogite xenolith derived from a subducted plate. Lawsonite records distinct δ18O depending on the host rock type and other rock types that were fluid sources during lawsonite growth. In general, lawsonite in metabasalt (7.6 ± 0.2–14.8 ± 1.1‰) is isotopically lighter than in metasediment (20.6 ± 1.4–24.1 ± 1.3‰) but heavier than in metagabbro (4.0 ± 0.4–7.9 ± 0.3‰). The extent of δ18O fractionation was evaluated for lawsonite–fluid and lawsonite–garnet pairs as a function of temperature (T). Results demonstrate that variations of >1.7‰ in lawsonite and >0.9‰ in garnet are not related to changing T. More likely, the relative contributions of fluids derived from isotopically heavier lithologies (e.g., sediments) versus lighter lithologies (e.g., ultramafic rocks) are the major control. Monte Carlo simulations were performed to investigate the sources of metasomatic fluids and the water/rock ratio that formed lawsonite‐bearing metasomatite. Results indicate that δ18OLws and δ18OGrt record interactions with fluids sourced from diverse lithologies (sediment, serpentinite), further supporting that δ18OLws is a useful indicator of subduction fluid‐rock interactions.