Chinese Journal of Lung Cancer (Sep 2022)

Efficacy Analysis of High-flow Nasal Oxygen Therapy in Patients 
Accepting Single-port Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Lobectomy

  • Xuejuan ZHU,
  • Xiaofan WANG,
  • Xing JIN,
  • Yonghua SANG,
  • Wentao YANG,
  • Yongbing CHEN,
  • Shanzhou DUAN

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2022.102.38
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 25, no. 9
pp. 642 – 650

Abstract

Read online

Background and objective Patients who underwent lobectomy resection are prone to hypoxemia, and the vast majority present with type I respiratory failure. Thus, improvement of hypoxemia is one of the most important factors to facilitate postoperative recovery of patients. In this study, the superiority-inferiority of different oxygen inhalation methods were compared with high-flow nasal oxygen therapy (HFNO), noninvasive mechanical ventilation (NIMV) and nasal oxygen breath (NOB) in patients with hypoxemia after single-port video-assisted thoracoscopic (VATS) lobectomy, and the clinical efficacy of HFNO in these patients was further investigated. Methods A total of 180 patients from the Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University in China with hypoxemia who accepting single-port VATS lobectomy from June 2021 to March 2022 were randomly divided into three groups (n=60), which were treated with HFNO, NIMV and NOB, respectively. The results of arterial blood gas analysis, patient’s comfort score and incidence of complications were observed before, 1 h, 6 h-12 h and after use. Statistical analyses were conducted using statistical program for social sciences 25.0 (SPSS 25.0), and P<0.05 was considered as statistical significance. Results For patients with hypoxemia after accepting single-port VATS lobectomy, HFNO was no less effective than NIMV (P=0.333), and both of whom could fast increase patients’ partial pressure of oxygen/fraction of inspiration O2 (PaO2/FiO2) compared to NOB (P<0.001). Besides, HFNO shows a great advantage in comfort degree and stay length (P<0.001, P=0.004), and incidence of complications were slightly lower than other groups (P=0.232). But it is worthy to note that HFNO is still slightly less effective than NIMV in patients with postoperative hypoxemia accompanied by elevated partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2). Conclusion For patients with hypoxemia who accepting single-port VATS lobectomy, HFNO can be used as the first choice. However, for patients with postoperative hypoxemia accompanied by elevated PaCO2, NIMV is still recommended to improve oxygenation.

Keywords