Revista de Odontologia da UNESP (May 2019)

Antimicrobial activity of mouth rinses against bacteria that initially colonizes dental’s surface

  • Isaac Jordão de Souza ARAÚJO,
  • Marília Souza de CARVALHO,
  • Thaís Rossini de OLIVEIRA,
  • Regina Maria PUPPIN-RONTANI,
  • José Francisco HÖFLING,
  • Renata de Oliveira MATTOS-GRANER,
  • Rafael Nóbrega STIPP

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-2577.13018
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 48, no. 0

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Introduction Much advertising in mouthwash is conveyed in all media appealing to the anti-plaque effect and rendering a disservice to the community. Mouth rinses are available over-the-count and differ on their compositions and antimicrobial effectiveness. Objective In this study, we evaluated the antimicrobial activity of 35 widely available mouth rinses against bacterial species involved in initiation of dental biofilm – Streptococcus gordonii, Streptococcus mitis, Streptococcus oralis, Streptococcus salivarius, and Streptococcus sanguinis. Material and method The Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) and the Minimum Bactericidal Concentration (MBC) of the evaluated mouth rinses were determined according to the Clinical & Laboratory Standards Institute protocols. Data were submitted to Kruskal-Wallis test and Mann-Whitney post hoc (α=0.05). Result About 70% of the mouth rinses achieved high antibacterial activity and 30%, a low antibacterial activity against all the species tested. The most ineffective mouth rinse showed antibacterial activity (MIC) at 1:1 dilution, while the most effective showed activity even at 1:2048 dilution, which may imply prolonged effect in the mouth. About 51% of mouth rinses showed bactericidal activity, and it was verified that cetylpyridinium chloride or chlorhexidine digluconate containing in the formulation were associated with the highest activity. Conclusion Most - but not all - mouth rinses commercially available are effective in inhibiting in vitro initial colonizers of dental surfaces.

Keywords