Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease (Oct 2021)

Identification of Frailty Using a Claims‐Based Frailty Index in the CoreValve Studies: Findings from the EXTEND‐FRAILTY Study

  • Jordan B. Strom,
  • Jiaman Xu,
  • Ariela R. Orkaby,
  • Changyu Shen,
  • Brian R. Charest,
  • Dae H. Kim,
  • David J. Cohen,
  • Daniel B. Kramer,
  • John A. Spertus,
  • Robert E. Gerszten,
  • Robert W. Yeh

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.121.022150
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 10, no. 19

Abstract

Read online

Background In aortic valve disease, the relationship between claims‐based frailty indices (CFIs) and validated measures of frailty constructed from in‐person assessments is unclear but may be relevant for retrospective ascertainment of frailty status when otherwise unmeasured. Methods and Results We linked adults aged ≥65 years in the US CoreValve Studies (linkage rate, 67%; mean age, 82.7±6.2 years, 43.1% women), to Medicare inpatient claims, 2011 to 2015. The Johns Hopkins CFI, validated on the basis of the Fried index, was generated for each study participant, and the association between CFI tertile and trial outcomes was evaluated as part of the EXTEND‐FRAILTY substudy. Among 2357 participants (64.9% frail), higher CFI tertile was associated with greater impairments in nutrition, disability, cognition, and self‐rated health. The primary outcome of all‐cause mortality at 1 year occurred in 19.3%, 23.1%, and 31.3% of those in tertiles 1 to 3, respectively (tertile 2 versus 1: hazard ratio, 1.22; 95% CI, 0.98–1.51; P=0.07; tertile 3 versus 1: hazard ratio, 1.73; 95% CI, 1.41–2.12; P<0.001). Secondary outcomes (bleeding, major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events, and hospitalization) were more frequent with increasing CFI tertile and persisted despite adjustment for age, sex, New York Heart Association class, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons risk score. Conclusions In linked Medicare and CoreValve study data, a CFI based on the Fried index consistently identified individuals with worse impairments in frailty, disability, cognitive dysfunction, and nutrition and a higher risk of death, hospitalization, bleeding, and major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events, independent of age and risk category. While not a surrogate for validated metrics of frailty using in‐person assessments, use of this CFI to ascertain frailty status among patients with aortic valve disease may be valid and prognostically relevant information when otherwise not measured.

Keywords