Veterinary Medicine: Research and Reports (Jan 2024)

Seropositivity, Comparison Between the Efficiency of Serological Tests and Risk Factors of Brucella Infection in Small Ruminants with History of Abortion in the Afar Region of North-Eastern Ethiopia

  • Tekle M,
  • Legesse M,
  • Mamo G

Journal volume & issue
Vol. Volume 14
pp. 245 – 252

Abstract

Read online

Muluken Tekle,1 Mengistu Legesse,2 Gezahegne Mamo1 1College of Veterinary Medicine and Agriculture, Addis Ababa University, Bishoftu, Ethiopia; 2Aklilu Lemma Institute of Pathobiology, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, EthiopiaCorrespondence: Muluken Tekle, Addis Ababa University, College of Veterinary Medicine and Agriculture, Tel +251910117279, Email [email protected]: Brucellosis is one of the most important reproductive diseases that cause abortion and breeding failure in small ruminants in Ethiopia. Therefore, our objective was to detect the seropositivity and risk factors of Brucella infection in small ruminants with history of abortion using modified RBPT, cELISA, and CFT in the Amibara district of the Afar Region, Ethiopia.Methods: Sera were collected from 226 animals (195 goats and 31ewes) and assessed for seropositivity of Brucella infection using modified RBPT, CFT, and competitive ELISA.Results: The overall seroprevalence was 12.0% (27 out of 226), 7.5% (17 out of 226), and 26.5% (60 out of 226) by mRBPT, CFT, and cELISA, respectively. Out of 27 sera that were reactive by mRBPT, 17 (63.0%) were also reactive by (CFT). Out of the 17 sera that were reactive by CFT and mRBPT, 14 (82.4%) were reactive by cELISA. Out of the 29 sera that were non-reactive by both mRBPT and CFT, 10 (34.5%) were found reactive by cELISA. Out of the 226 sera that were tested by both mRBPT and cELISA, 20 (8.9%) were reactive by both tests, while 159 (70.4%) were non-reactive by both tests. The percentage of test agreement (79.2%) between mRBPT and cELISA was poor (k=0.353). High seropositivity for Brucella infection was significantly associated with the presence of retained placenta in the studied animals (adjusted OR=2.2, 95% CI, 1.1– 4.4, P=0.030) as detected by cELISA.Conclusion: The current study revealed that a cELISA-based seroepidemiological survey increases the likelihood of detecting individuals with brucellosis and provides reliable evidence for mRBPT. Furthermore, there was a significant association between seropositivity for Brucella infection and retained placenta. These findings emphasize the necessity for proactive measures to reduce the economic impact of brucellosis and mitigate the risk of zoonotic transmission.Keywords: abortion, brucellosis, seropositivity, small ruminants

Keywords