SMALLHOLDER ADOPTION OF GREEN PRODUCTION TECHNOLOGIES ON THE NORTH CHINA PLAIN: EVIDENCE FROM SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY BACKYARDS

Abstract

<List><ListItem><ItemContent><p>● A systematical technology diffusion mode that can simultaneously achieve smallholders' technology adoption to different scales was discovered.</p></ItemContent></ListItem> <ListItem><ItemContent><p>● Collaborative, tree-shaped and jump-start modes are the main forms to promote technology diffusion.</p></ItemContent></ListItem> <ListItem><ItemContent><p>● The combination of three modes above facilitates technology diffusion to different scales.</p></ItemContent></ListItem> <ListItem><ItemContent><p>● The STB-based technology diffusion empowered smallholders through technology adoption.</p></ItemContent></ListItem> <ListItem><ItemContent><p>● Trust is the key to promoting technology dependence and adoption among smallholders.</p></ItemContent></ListItem></List></p> <p>Understanding the impact of agricultural socialized services on smallholder adoption of green production technologies and their mechanisms of action is of great importance for sustainability of farming systems. Currently, there were numerous related studies, but it is still unclear how to gradually achieve the diffusion of technological innovations on pilot sites to a regional level. To answer this question, this paper presents the pathways and mechanisms of green production technologies diffusion by comparing international typical service organizations or modes such as agricultural technology extension service centers (ATESC), farmer field schools (FFS), participatory technology innovation (PTI) and integrated colearning approach (ICLA), while taking Wangzhuang Science and Technology Backyard (WZ STB) in Quzhou, Hebei Province, China as an example. This research had three key outcomes. (1) The combination of collaborative, tree-shaped and jump-start diffusion modes promotes the diffusion of participatory technology innovation to different scales, such as farmers, villages and counties. (2) The three diffusion modes combine and expand the advantages of existing international modes. The collaborative diffusion mode not only provides full scope for the advantages of PTI, but also provides smallholders with service supply for the whole production period. The tree-shaped diffusion mode combines the advantages of FFS from point technology innovation to village diffusion, while achieving a full range of technical service support. The jump-start diffusion mode cannot only achieve large-scale technology diffusion like ATESC and ICLA, but also empower smallholders through adaptive technology innovation. (3) Trust is the key to promoting smallholder reliance on the science and technology provided by STB and to promote their adoption of green production technologies. Accordingly, the following policy recommendations were proposed: strengthen the combination of top-down and bottom-up technology innovation and diffusion models, establish an effective service communication platform and evaluation mechanism, and strengthen the linkage mechanism between socialized services providers and smallholders, which will provide a realistic basis for the national policy of targeted socialized services provision and promote smallholder adoption of green production technologies.

Keywords

• agricultural socialized services|green production technologies|green transformation of agriculture|technology adoption|technology trust