Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare (Nov 2022)

MRI Evaluation of Mullerian Duct Anomalies: Practical Classification by the New ASRM System

  • Al Najar MS,
  • Al Ryalat NT,
  • Sadaqah JS,
  • Husami RY,
  • Alzoubi KH

Journal volume & issue
Vol. Volume 15
pp. 2579 – 2589

Abstract

Read online

Mahasen S Al Najar,1 Nosaiba T Al Ryalat,1 Jaffer S Sadaqah,1 Rawand Y Husami,1 Karem H Alzoubi2,3 1Department of Diagnostic Radiology, The University of Jordan Hospital, Amman, Jordan; 2Department of Pharmacy Practice and Pharmacotherapeutics, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates; 3Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, JordanCorrespondence: Mahasen S Al Najar, Department of Diagnostic Radiology, The University of Jordan Hospital, P. O. Box 13046, Queen Rania Street, Amman, 11942, Jordan, Fax +96265353388, Email [email protected]: To describe variable mullerian duct anomalies using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and to classify these anomalies according to the available classification systems, namely the American Fertility Society (AFS) system, the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE) system, and the new American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM) system.Design: Retrospective chart review.Subjects: The pelvic MRI studies and the clinical records of 64 females with mullerian congenital anomalies were retrospectively reviewed between January 2010 and December 2021. The mean age was 22 years (age range 2– 63 years).Main Outcome Measures: Detailed imaging findings were recorded, and the resulting mullerian anomalies were then classified according to the three classification systems of interest.Results: Variable mullerian anomalies were found among patients with multiple frequencies. Mullerian agenesis and hypoplasia were found in 12 patients (19%) and 16 patients (25%), respectively. Uterus didelphys was found in 5 patients (8%). Twelve (19%) patients had septate uterus, while 8 (12.5%) had a bicornuate anomaly. Unicornuate uterus was present in 7 patients (11%). Isolated vaginal anomaly was diagnosed in 4 patients (6%). Renal/urinary tract imaging was available for 27 (42%) patients, and accompanying urinary tract anomalies were noted in 10 of them (37%). Few ovarian and other extra-renal anomalies were observed.Conclusion: MRI could efficiently delineate the mullerian anomalies regardless of their complexity. Most of these anomalies were more efficaciously categorized by the ESHRE and the new ASRM systems, compared to the originally widely used AFS system. The new ASRM classification was found to be more practical as it is a modification of the original AFS system, using drawings with clear descriptions instead of symbols. This is particularly helpful in the radiological era, saving time and effort.Keywords: mullerian duct anomalies, classification system, renal agenesis, uterus, pelvic MRI

Keywords