Journal of Geodetic Science (Dec 2023)

Global Geopotential Models assessment in Ecuador based on geoid heights and geopotential values

  • Carrión José,
  • Flores Fredy,
  • Rodríguez Freddy,
  • Pozo Miguel

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/jogs-2022-0165
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 13, no. 1
pp. 6109 – 6131

Abstract

Read online

Since the 1960s, the analysis of disturbed satellite orbits to infer Earth’s gravity field functionals has been an important element in determining the Earth’s gravitational field. The long wavelengths of the gravitational field are recovered through the analysis of non-Keplerian variations in the orbital path of artificial satellites, from their tracking from ground stations (Satellite Laser Ranging, Doppler Orbitography and Radiopositioning Integrated by Satellite, and Precise Range And Range-Rate Equipment), from satellite-to-satellite tracking, or by microwave interferometry. In addition, differences in gravitational acceleration in three mutually orthogonal dimensions can be determined by employing a differential accelerometer carried on artificial satellites (satellite gravity gradiometry, SGG). Satellite gravimetry provides global information (long wavelengths) of the Earth’s gravitational field, which is the fundamental basis for the implementation of Global Geopotential Models (GGMs). The GGMs are one of the key tools for the representation of the Earth’s gravity field and, therefore, for the establishment of a Global Height System (i.e., International Height Reference System), whose fundamental reference surface is defined in terms of a geopotential value. In this study, the validation of high-resolution GGMs (coefficients up to degree 2190) was performed based on their performance in Ecuador by comparing geoid heights estimated by the GGMs with the corresponding values derived from Global Navigation Satellite System/leveling records. Furthermore, geopotential values from the GGMs are compared with the corresponding value obtained for the Ecuadorian Vertical Datum by solving the fixed geodetic boundary value problem. The obtained results indicated that the precision of the high-resolution GGMs does not reach the established requirements for the geopotential computation in the International Height Reference Frame fundamental stations.

Keywords