Frontiers in Medicine (Sep 2023)

Consensus recommendations for the treatment and management of patients with Fabry disease on migalastat: a modified Delphi study

  • Daniel G. Bichet,
  • Robert J. Hopkin,
  • Patrício Aguiar,
  • Patrício Aguiar,
  • Sridhar R. Allam,
  • Sridhar R. Allam,
  • Yin-Hsiu Chien,
  • Yin-Hsiu Chien,
  • Roberto Giugliani,
  • Roberto Giugliani,
  • Staci Kallish,
  • Sabina Kineen,
  • Olivier Lidove,
  • Olivier Lidove,
  • Dau-Ming Niu,
  • Dau-Ming Niu,
  • Iacopo Olivotto,
  • Juan Politei,
  • Paul Rakoski,
  • Roser Torra,
  • Camilla Tøndel,
  • Camilla Tøndel,
  • Derralynn A. Hughes

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2023.1220637
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 10

Abstract

Read online

ObjectiveFabry disease is a progressive disorder caused by deficiency of the α-galactosidase A enzyme (α-Gal A), leading to multisystemic organ damage with heterogenous clinical presentation. The addition of the oral chaperone therapy migalastat to the available treatment options for Fabry disease is not yet universally reflected in all treatment guidelines. These consensus recommendations are intended to provide guidance for the treatment and monitoring of patients with Fabry disease receiving migalastat.MethodsA modified Delphi process was conducted to determine consensus on treatment decisions and monitoring of patients with Fabry disease receiving migalastat. The multidisciplinary panel comprised 14 expert physicians across nine specialties and two patients with Fabry disease. Two rounds of Delphi surveys were completed and recommendations on the use of biomarkers, multidisciplinary monitoring, and treatment decisions were generated based on statements that reached consensus.ResultsThe expert panel reached consensus agreement on 49 of 54 statements, including 16 that reached consensus in round 1. Statements that reached consensus agreement are summarized in recommendations for migalastat treatment and monitoring, including baseline and follow-up assessments and frequency. All patients with Fabry disease and an amenable mutation may initiate migalastat treatment if they have evidence of Fabry-related symptoms and/or organ involvement. Treatment decisions should include holistic assessment of the patient, considering clinical symptoms and organ involvement as well as patient-reported outcomes and patient preference. The reliability of α-Gal A and globotriaosylsphingosine as pharmacodynamic response biomarkers remains unclear.ConclusionThese recommendations build on previously published guidelines to highlight the importance of holistic, multidisciplinary monitoring for patients with Fabry disease receiving migalastat, in addition to shared decision-making regarding treatments and monitoring throughout the patient journey.GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT

Keywords