PLoS ONE (Jan 2020)

Discordant vascular parameter measurements in diabetic and non-diabetic eyes detected by different optical coherence tomography angiography devices.

  • Yi Chen,
  • Sawarin Laotaweerungsawat,
  • Tong Zhao,
  • Zeeshan Haq,
  • Xiuyun Liu,
  • Catherine Psaras,
  • Daphne Yang,
  • Jay M Stewart

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234664
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 15, no. 6
p. e0234664

Abstract

Read online

PurposeTo compare quantitative changes in macular parameters in diabetic patients detected by two optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) instruments.Methods80 phakic eyes were classified as no diabetes, diabetes without diabetic retinopathy (DR), mild non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR), and severe NPDR or proliferative DR (PDR). OCTA was performed using devices from two manufacturers (Zeiss and Heidelberg). Superficial and deeper vascular skeleton density (SVSD, DVSD), superficial and deeper vessel area density (SVAD, DVAD), choriocapillaris flow voids (CCFV), and choroidal flow voids (CFV) were calculated. Inter-device comparisons were performed using the size comparison index (SCI) and the discrepancy index (DI).ResultsThe two devices were inconsistent in SVSD, DVSD, DVAD, CCFV and CFV parameters (all P 0.05). The mean DI of CCFV was statistically different between the four groups (P ConclusionsThe two instruments were largely inconsistent in the measurement of macular parameters relevant to DR. The choice of imaging device can impact OCTA analytics and should be taken into account when drawing conclusions about DR-related changes.