Biogeosciences (Dec 2022)

Observed water and light limitation across global ecosystems

  • F. Jonard,
  • F. Jonard,
  • A. F. Feldman,
  • A. F. Feldman,
  • D. J. Short Gianotti,
  • D. Entekhabi

DOI
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-5575-2022
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 19
pp. 5575 – 5590

Abstract

Read online

With a changing climate, it is becoming increasingly critical to understand vegetation responses to limiting environmental factors. Here, we investigate the spatial and temporal patterns of light and water limitation on photosynthesis using an observational framework. Our study is unique in characterizing the nonlinear relationships between photosynthesis and water and light, acknowledging approximately two regime behaviours (no limitation and varying degrees of limitation). It is also unique in using an observational framework instead of using model-derived photosynthesis properties. We combine data from three different satellite sensors, i.e., sun-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF) from the TROPOspheric Monitoring Instrument (TROPOMI), surface soil moisture from the Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP) microwave radiometer, and vegetation greenness from the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS). We find both single-regime and two-regime models describe SIF sensitivity to soil moisture and photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) across the globe. The distribution and strength of soil moisture limitation on SIF are mapped in the water-limited environments, while the distribution and strength of PAR limitations are mapped in the energy-limited environments. A two-regime behaviour is detected in 73 % of the cases for water limitation on photosynthesis, while two-regime detection is much lower at 41 % for light limitation on photosynthesis. SIF sensitivity to PAR strongly increases along moisture gradients, reflecting mesic vegetation's adaptation to making rapid usage of incoming light availability on the weekly timescales. The transition point detected between the two regimes is connected to soil type and mean annual precipitation for the SIF–soil moisture relationship and for the SIF–PAR relationship. These thresholds therefore have an explicit relation to properties of the landscape, although they may also be related to finer details of the vegetation and soil interactions not resolved by the spatial scales here. The simple functions and thresholds are emergent behaviours capturing the interaction of many processes. The observational thresholds and strength of coupling can be used as benchmark information for Earth system models, especially those that characterize gross primary production mechanisms and vegetation dynamics.