International Journal of Implant Dentistry (Nov 2023)

Accuracy of a novel modified single computed tomography scanning method for assisting dental implant placement: a retrospective observational study

  • Hiroaki Shimizu,
  • Takuya Mino,
  • Yoko Kurosaki,
  • Hikaru Arakawa,
  • Kana Tokumoto,
  • Aya Kimura-Ono,
  • Kenji Maekawa,
  • Takuo Kuboki

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40729-023-00509-8
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 9, no. 1
pp. 1 – 14

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Purpose The aim of this study is to compare dental implant placement accuracy of three surgical guide fabrication methods: single (SCT) and double computed tomography (DCT), and a newly developed modified SCT (MSCT) scan method. Methods A total of 183 cases (183 surgical guides, and 485 implants) of static-guide-assisted implant placement surgery using the SCT, DCT, or MSCT methods in a dental clinic were included in the study. Three-dimensional (3D) deviations (mm) at the entry and tip of the implant body between preoperative simulation and actual placement were measured as surrogate endpoints of implant placement accuracy. The following survey details were collected from medical records and CT data: sex, age at implant placement surgery, surgical guide fabrication method, number of remaining teeth, implant length, implant location, alveolar bone quality, and bone surface inclination at implant placement site in preoperative simulation, etc. Risk factors for reducing implant placement accuracy were investigated using generalized estimating equations. Results The SCT and DCT methods (odds ratios [ORs] vs. MSCT method: 1.438, 1.178, respectively), posterior location (OR: 1.114), bone surface buccolingual inclination (OR: 0.997), and age at implant placement surgery (OR: 0.995) were significant risk factors for larger 3D deviation at the entry; the SCT (OR: 1.361) and DCT methods (OR: 1.418), posterior location (OR: 1.190), implant length (OR: 1.051), and age at implant placement surgery (OR: 0.995) were significant risk factors for larger 3D deviation at the tip of the implant body. Conclusions Implant placement accuracy was better using the MSCT method compared to the SCT and DCT methods.

Keywords