Non-maintenance intravesical Bacillus Calmette–Guérin induction therapy with eight doses in patients with high- or highest-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer: a retrospective non-randomized comparative study
Makito Miyake,
Kota Iida,
Nobutaka Nishimura,
Tatsuki Miyamoto,
Kiyohide Fujimoto,
Ryotaro Tomida,
Kazumasa Matsumoto,
Kazuyuki Numakura,
Junichi Inokuchi,
Shuichi Morizane,
Takahiro Yoneyama,
Yoshiaki Matsumura,
Takashige Abe,
Masaharu Inoue,
Takeshi Yamada,
Naoki Terada,
Shuya Hirao,
Motohide Uemura,
Yuto Matsushita,
Rikiya Taoka,
Takashi Kobayashi,
Takahiro Kojima,
Yoshiyuki Matsui,
Hiroshi Kitamura,
Hiroyuki Nishiyama,
on behalf of the Japanese Urological Oncology Group
Affiliations
Makito Miyake
Department of Urology, Nara Medical University
Kota Iida
Department of Urology, Nara Medical University
Nobutaka Nishimura
Department of Urology, Nara Medical University
Tatsuki Miyamoto
Department of Urology, Nara Medical University
Kiyohide Fujimoto
Department of Urology, Nara Medical University
Ryotaro Tomida
Department of Urology, National Hospital Organization Shikoku Cancer Center
Kazumasa Matsumoto
Department of Urology, Kitasato University School of Medicine
Kazuyuki Numakura
Department of Urology, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine
Junichi Inokuchi
Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University
Shuichi Morizane
Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Tottori University
Takahiro Yoneyama
Department of Advanced Transplant and Regenerative Medicine, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine
Yoshiaki Matsumura
Department of Urology, Nara Prefecture General Medical Center
Takashige Abe
Department of Urology, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine
Masaharu Inoue
Department of Urology, National Cancer Center Hospital East
Takeshi Yamada
Department of Urology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine
Naoki Terada
Department of Urology, Miyazaki University
Shuya Hirao
Department of Urology, Hirao Hospital
Motohide Uemura
Department of Urology, Osaka University, Graduate School of Medicine
Yuto Matsushita
Department of Urology, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine
Rikiya Taoka
Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Kagawa University
Takashi Kobayashi
Department of Urology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine
Takahiro Kojima
Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba
Yoshiyuki Matsui
Department of Urology, National Cancer Center Hospital
Hiroshi Kitamura
Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toyama
Hiroyuki Nishiyama
Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba
on behalf of the Japanese Urological Oncology Group
Abstract Background To explore possible solutions to overcome chronic Bacillus Calmette–Guérin (BCG) shortage affecting seriously the management of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) in Europe and throughout the world, we investigated whether non-maintenance eight-dose induction BCG (iBCG) was comparable to six-dose iBCG plus maintenance BCG (mBCG). Methods This observational study evaluated 2669 patients with high- or highest-risk NMIBC who treated with iBCG with or without mBCG during 2000–2019. The patients were classified into five groups according to treatment pattern: 874 (33%) received non-maintenance six-dose iBCG (Group A), 405 (15%) received six-dose iBCG plus mBCG (Group B), 1189 (44%) received non-maintenance seven−/eight-dose iBCG (Group C), 60 (2.2%) received seven−/eight-dose iBCG plus mBCG, and 141 (5.3%) received only ≤5-dose iBCG. Recurrence-free survival (RFS), progression-free survival, and cancer-specific survival were estimated and compared using Kaplan–Meier analysis and the log-rank test, respectively. Propensity score-based one-to-one matching was performed using a multivariable logistic regression model based on covariates to obtain balanced groups. To eliminate possible immortal bias, 6-, 12-, 18-, and 24-month conditional landmark analyses of RFS were performed. Results RFS comparison confirmed that mBCG yielded significant benefit following six-dose iBCG (Group B) in recurrence risk reduction compared to iBCG alone (groups A and C) before (P < 0.001 and P = 0.0016, respectively) and after propensity score matching (P = 0.001 and P = 0.0074, respectively). Propensity score-matched sequential landmark analyses revealed no significant differences between groups B and C at 12, 18, and 24 months, whereas landmark analyses at 6 and 12 months showed a benefit of mBCG following six-dose iBCG compared to non-maintenance six-dose iBCG (P = 0.0055 and P = 0.032, respectively). There were no significant differences in the risks of progression and cancer-specific death in all comparisons of the matched cohorts. Conclusions Although non-maintenance eight-dose iBCG was inferior to six-dose iBCG plus mBCG, the former might be an alternative remedy in the BCG shortage era. To overcome this challenge, further investigation is warranted to confirm the real clinical value of non-maintenance eight-dose iBCG.