Foods (May 2022)

Comparison of Real-Time PCR and Droplet Digital PCR for the Quantitative Detection of <i>Lactiplantibacillus</i> <i>plantarum</i> subsp. <i>plantarum</i>

  • Chang-Hun Choi,
  • Eiseul Kim,
  • Seung-Min Yang,
  • Da-Som Kim,
  • Seung-Man Suh,
  • Ga-Young Lee,
  • Hae-Yeong Kim

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11091331
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 11, no. 9
p. 1331

Abstract

Read online

Droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) is one of the newest and most promising tools providing absolute quantification of target DNA molecules. Despite its emerging applications in microorganisms, few studies reported its use for detecting lactic acid bacteria. This study evaluated the applicability of a ddPCR assay targeting molecular genes obtained from in silico analysis for detecting Lactiplantibacillus plantarum subsp. plantarum, a bacterium mainly used as a starter or responsible for fermentation in food. The performance characteristics of a ddPCR were compared to those of a quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR). To compare the linearity and sensitivity of a qPCR and ddPCR, the calibration curve for a qPCR and the regression curve for a ddPCR were obtained using genomic DNA [102–108 colony-forming units (CFU)/mL] extracted from a pure culture and spiked food sample. Both the qPCR and ddPCR assays exhibited good linearity with a high coefficient of determination in the pure culture and spiked food sample (R2 ≥ 0.996). The ddPCR showed a 10-fold lower limit of detection, suggesting that a ddPCR is more sensitive than a qPCR. However, a ddPCR has limitations in the absolute quantitation of high bacterial concentrations (>106 CFU/mL). In conclusion, a ddPCR can be a reliable method for detecting and quantifying lactic acid bacteria in food.

Keywords