Journal of Animal Reproduction and Biotechnology (Dec 2018)

Comparison of Spermatozoa Recovery Methods on Cauda Epididymal Sperm of Hanwoo Bulls

  • Sung-Sik Kang,
  • Ui-Hyung Kim,
  • Min-Hyeong Jeon,
  • Myung-Suk Lee,
  • Sang-Rae Cho

DOI
https://doi.org/10.12750/JET.2018.33.4.321
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 33, no. 4
pp. 321 – 326

Abstract

Read online

In this study, two epididymal spermatozoa recovery methods in relation to sperm number, motility, viability and acrosome reaction were examined. Seven bulls were castrated and 7 testicles with epididymides were transferred to the laboratoy. Epididymis in each bull was randomly used for flushing and mincing methods with semen extender (Optixcell, IMV, France). The recovered spermatozoa with adjusted sperm concentration to 40 × 106 cells/mL was diluted with optixcell and cryopreserved. In experiment 1, the difference in the total number of spermatozoa using flushing and mincing methods was insignificant (2570.0 and 2505.2 × 106 cells/mL, respectively). For experiment 2, the percentage of motile spermatozoa and motility parameters between flushing and mincing methods were studied through the use of sperm class analyzer after frozen-thawing. The percentage of total motile sperm between flushing and mincing methods was almost the same with 89.5±12.8 and 91.4±7.9%, respectively. The same is the case with experiment 3 wherein the viability and acrosomal integrity of frozen-thawed epididymal spermatozoa by flushing and mincing was insignificantly different. The results from the study showed that both flushing and mincing methods can be used for epididymal spermatozoa recovery in bull.

Keywords