Remote Sensing (Oct 2023)

Evaluating Close-Range Photogrammetry for 3D Understory Fuel Characterization and Biomass Prediction in Pine Forests

  • Gina R. Cova,
  • Susan J. Prichard,
  • Eric Rowell,
  • Brian Drye,
  • Paige Eagle,
  • Maureen C. Kennedy,
  • Deborah G. Nemens

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15194837
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 15, no. 19
p. 4837

Abstract

Read online

Understory biomass plays an important role in forests, and explicit characterizations of live and dead understory vegetation are critical for wildland fuel characterization and to link understory vegetation to ecosystem processes. Current methods to accurately model understory fuel complexity in 3D rely on expensive and often inaccessible technologies. Structure-from-motion close-range photogrammetry, in which ordinary photographs or video stills are overlaid to generate point clouds, is promising as an alternative method to generate 3D models of fuels at a fraction of the cost of more traditional field surveys. In this study, we compared the performance of close-range photogrammetry with field sampling surveys to assess the utility of this alternative technique for quantifying understory fuel structure. Using a commercially available GoPro camera, we generated 3D point cloud models from video-derived image stills of 138 sampling plots across two western ponderosa pine and two southeastern slash pine sites. We directly compared structural metrics derived from the photogrammetry to those derived from field sampling, then evaluated predictive models of biomass calibrated by means of destructive sampling. Photogrammetry-derived measures of occupied volume and fuel height showed strong agreements with field sampling (Pearson’s R = 0.81 and 0.86, respectively). While we found weak relationships between photogrammetry metrics and biomass 0 to 10 cm in height, occupied volume and a novel metric to characterize the vertical profile of vegetation produced the strongest relationships with biomass above the litter layer (i.e., >10 cm) across different fuel types (R2 = 0.55–0.76). The application of this technique has the potential to provide managers with an accessible option for inexpensive data collection and can lay the groundwork for the rapid collection of input datasets to train landscape-scale fuel models.

Keywords