Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine (May 2024)

Prognostic significance of compliance with fractional flow reserve guidance on diverse vessel-related clinical outcomes

  • Yang Zhang,
  • Bangguo Yang,
  • Yicong Ye,
  • Xiliang Zhao,
  • Yaodong Ding,
  • Yi Ye,
  • Liang Zhang,
  • Dawei Tan,
  • Gong Zhang,
  • Xiaoyu Duan,
  • Quan Li,
  • Yong Zeng

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2024.1370345
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 11

Abstract

Read online

BackgroundIn patients underwent fractional flow reserve (FFR) assessment, a noteworthy proportion of adverse events occur in vessels in which FFR has not been measured. However, the effect of these non-target vessel-related events on the evaluation of FFR-related benefits remains unknown.Methods and resultsIn this retrospective study, vessels subjected to FFR measurement were grouped as FFR-based approach and non-compliance with FFR based on whether they received FFR-based treatment. Using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) to account for potential confounding, we investigated the association between compliance with FFR and 5-year target vessel failure (TVF) non-target vessel failure (NTVF) and vessel-oriented composite endpoints (VOCEs). Of the 1,119 vessels, 201 did not receive FFR-based treatment. After IPTW adjustment, a significantly lower hazard of TVF was observed in the FFR-based approach group (HR: 0.56; 95% CI: 0.34–0.92). While, the intergroup difference in hazard of NTVF (HR: 1.02; 95% CI: 0.45–2.31) and VOCEs (HR: 0.69; 95% CI: 0.45–1.05) were nonsignificant.ConclusionsIn patients with CAD subjected to FFR, the FFR-based treatment yields a sustained clinical benefit in terms of the risks of target vessel-related events. The dilution of non-target vessel-related events renders the difference favoring the FFR-based approach nonsignificant.

Keywords