Patient Preference and Adherence (Jul 2022)

Analysis of Related Factors of Coping Styles in Infertile Patients in Central China

  • Mao J,
  • Guo H,
  • Wang J,
  • Li Y,
  • Xu M

Journal volume & issue
Vol. Volume 16
pp. 1605 – 1612

Abstract

Read online

Jing Mao,1 Huiping Guo,2 Juan Wang,1 Ying Li,1 Meng Xu1 1Department of Reproductive Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University of Chinese Medicine, Zhengzhou, People’s Republic of China; 2Nursing College, Henan University of Chinese Medicine, Zhengzhou, People’s Republic of ChinaCorrespondence: Jing Mao, Department of Reproductive Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University of Chinese Medicine, No. 19 Renmin Road, Jinshui District, Zhengzhou, 450000, People’s Republic of China, Tel +86-18703657086, Email [email protected]: To investigate the psychosocial factors, including personality characteristics, coping style, social support and alexithymia of infertile patients, and explore the relevant factors regarding the medical coping style choice of infertile patients in central China.Methods: Sixty infertile patients in the reproductive medicine centre in our hospital were investigated using a self-made general situation questionnaire; internal control, powerful others and opportunities scale; social support rating scale; and medical coping questionnaire, and the data was analysed.Results: Of the 60 infertile patients, 57 (95%) were female, with an average age of 27.85 ± 14.52 years old, and 42 (70%) had secondary infertility. The score of the face dimension was lower than the norm (19.17 ± 2.18 vs 19.43 ± 3.82, P = 0.012), and those of the avoidance (15.98 ± 2.43 vs 14.41 ± 2. 94, P = 0.030) and yield (9.48 ± 3.19 vs 8.83 ± 3.19, P = 0.012) dimensions were higher than the norm. The multiple linear regression analysis showed that internal control and the utilisation of support were influencing factors for the coping style (R2 = 0.271, adjusted R2 = 0.144, F = 9.827, P < 0.001), and internal control was the influencing factor for the avoidance coping style (R2 = 0.024, adjusted R2 = 0.021, F = 3.363, P = 0.014). The education level, opportunity and utilisation of support factors influenced the yield dimension (R2 = 0.087, adjusted R2 = 0.076, F = 7.749, P < 0.001).Conclusion: Considering the association between the coping styles and psychosocial factors, it was recommended to formulate targeted intervention strategies based on these influencing factors to guide patients to adopt positive coping styles and achieve good outcomes.Keywords: infertility, coping style, psychosocial factors, relevance

Keywords