Remote Sensing (Aug 2024)
Morphological Characteristics and Development Rate of Gullies in Three Main Agro-Geomorphological Regions of Northeast China
Abstract
Gully erosion poses a significant global concern due to its role in land degradation and soil erosion, particularly pronounced in Northeast China’s diverse agro-geomorphic regions. However, there is a lack of comprehensive studies on gully characteristics, development rates, and the topographic threshold of gully formation in these areas. To address this gap, we selected three different agro-geomorphic watersheds, named HL (Hailun), ML (Muling), and YKS (Yakeshi), with areas of 30.88 km2, 31.53 km2, and 21.98 km2, respectively. Utilizing high-resolution (2.1 m, 2 m) remote sensing imagery (ZY-3, GF-1), we analyzed morphological parameters (length, width, area, perimeter, etc.) and land use changes for all permanent gullies between 2013 and 2023. Approximately 30% of gullies were selected for detailed study of the upstream drainage area and gully head slopes to establish the topographic threshold for gully formation (S = a·A−b). In HL, ML, and YKS, average gully lengths were 526.22 m, 208.64 m, and 614.20 m, respectively, with corresponding widths of 13.28 m, 8.45 m, and 9.32 m. The gully number densities in the three areas were 3.14, 25.18, and 0.82/km2, respectively, with a gully density of 1.65, 5.25, and 0.50 km km−2, and 3%, 5%, and 1% of the land has disappeared due to gully erosion, respectively. YKS exhibited the highest gully head retreat rate at 17.50 m yr−1, significantly surpassing HL (12.24 m yr−1) and ML (7.11 m yr−1). Areal erosion rates were highest in HL (277.79 m2 yr−1) and lowest in YKS (105.22 m2 yr−1), with ML intermediate at 243.36 m2 yr−1. However, there was no significant difference in gully expansion rate (0.37–0.42 m yr−1) among the three areas (p > 0.05). Differences in gully development dynamics among the three regions were influenced by land use, slope, and topographic factors. The topographic threshold (S = a·A−b) for gully formation varied: HL emphasized drainage area (a = 0.052, b = 0.52), YKS highlighted soil resistance (a = 0.12, b = 0.36), and the parameters a and b of ML fell within the range between these of HL and YKS (a = 0.044, b = 0.27). This study has enriched the scope and database of global gully erosion research, providing a scientific basis for gully erosion prevention and control planning in Northeast China.
Keywords