Distinct Mechanical Properties of the Respiratory System Evaluated by Forced Oscillation Technique in Acute Exacerbation of COPD and Acute Decompensated Heart Failure
Silvia Terraneo,
Rocco Francesco Rinaldo,
Giuseppe Francesco Sferrazza Papa,
Fulvia Ribolla,
Carlo Gulotta,
Laura Maugeri,
Emiliano Gatti,
Stefano Centanni,
Fabiano Di Marco
Affiliations
Silvia Terraneo
Respiratory Unit, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, San Paolo Hospital, Department of Health Sciences, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20142 Milan, Italy
Rocco Francesco Rinaldo
Respiratory Unit, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, San Paolo Hospital, Department of Health Sciences, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20142 Milan, Italy
Giuseppe Francesco Sferrazza Papa
Department of Health Sciences, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20142 Milan, Italy
Fulvia Ribolla
Pneumologia AOU San Luigi Gonzaga, 10043 Orbassano, Turin, Italy
Carlo Gulotta
Respiratory Unit, Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital, Department of Health Sciences, Università degli Studi di Milano, 24127 Bergamo, Italy
Laura Maugeri
Respiratory Unit, Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital, Department of Health Sciences, Università degli Studi di Milano, 24127 Bergamo, Italy
Emiliano Gatti
Respiratory Unit, Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital, Department of Health Sciences, Università degli Studi di Milano, 24127 Bergamo, Italy
Stefano Centanni
Respiratory Unit, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, San Paolo Hospital, Department of Health Sciences, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20142 Milan, Italy
Fabiano Di Marco
Casa di Cura del Policlinico, Department of Neurorehabilitation Sciences, 20144 Milan, Italy
Discriminating between cardiac and pulmonary dyspnea is essential for patients’ management. We investigated the feasibility and ability of forced oscillation techniques (FOT) in distinguishing between acute exacerbation of COPD (AECOPD), and acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) in a clinical emergency setting. We enrolled 49 patients admitted to the emergency department (ED) for dyspnea and acute respiratory failure for AECOPD, or ADHF, and 11 healthy subjects. All patients were able to perform bedside FOT measurement. Patients with AECOPD showed a significantly higher inspiratory resistance at 5 Hz, Xrs5 (179% of predicted, interquartile range, IQR 94–224 vs. 100 IQR 67–149; p = 0.019), and a higher inspiratory reactance at 5 Hz (151%, IQR 74–231 vs. 57 IQR 49–99; p = 0.005) than patients with ADHF. Moreover, AECOPD showed higher heterogeneity of ventilation (respiratory system resistance difference at 5 and 19 Hz, Rrs5-19: 1.49 cmH2O/(L/s), IQR 1.03–2.16 vs. 0.44 IQR 0.22–0.76; p = 0.030), and a higher percentage of flow limited breaths compared to ADHF (10%, IQR 0–100 vs. 0 IQR 0–12; p = 0.030). FOT, which resulted in a suitable tool to be used in the ED setting, has the ability to identify distinct mechanical properties of the respiratory system in AECOPD and ADHF.