Hellenic Journal of Cardiology (Nov 2021)

Transcatheter closure of paravalvular leak: Multicenter experience and follow-up

  • Konstantinos Kalogeras,
  • Konstantina Ntalekou,
  • Konstantina Aggeli,
  • Carmen Moldovan,
  • Efstratios Katsianos,
  • Charalambos Kalantzis,
  • Evelina Bei,
  • Christos Mourmouris,
  • Konstantinos Spargias,
  • Michail Chrissoheris,
  • Petros Dardas,
  • Konstantinos Aznaouridis,
  • Afroditi Tzifa,
  • Eustratios Theofilogiannakos,
  • Gerasimos Siasos,
  • Dimitrios Tousoulis,
  • Manolis Vavuranakis

Journal volume & issue
Vol. 62, no. 6
pp. 416 – 422

Abstract

Read online

Background: Paravalvular leak (PVL) is a common complication following valve replacement, which leads to heart failure and hemolysis. Transcatheter PVL closure has emerged as a reliable alternative with promising results. We quote the combined three-center experience of PVL patients treated percutaneously. Methods: Consecutive patients treated percutaneously for PVL were retrospectively studied. Procedural characteristics, inhospital, and long-term clinical outcomes were assessed. Technical (successful deployment) and clinical (NYHA and/or hemolysis improvement) success were evaluated. Results: In total, 39 patients treated for PVL in either the aortic (12 patients) or the mitral (27 patients) position were studied. Amplatzer Vascular Plug III was the most commonly used device among the 45 devices totally implanted. Postprocedurally, the rates of at least moderate PVL (87.5% preprocedurally vs 10.5% at discharge) and functional status (mean NYHA class 2.8 ± 0.7 on admission vs 1.5 ± 0.8 at follow-up) were statistically significantly improved.Total population technical success rate was 89.7%, being comparable between patients treated for mitral or aortic valve PVLs (92.6% vs 83.3%, respectively). Clinical success was achieved in 82.1% of patient cohort without statistical difference among those with isolated aortic or mitral PVL or among those with PVL closure an indication of heart failure or hemolysis. During a mean follow-up of 33.5 months, five patients died, including one periprocedural death. Conclusions: This multicenter recorded experience confirms that percutaneous PVL closure can be performed with high technical and clinical success rates and limited complications that lead to significant PVL reduction and functional status improvement.

Keywords