Applied Sciences (Oct 2022)

Comparison of Patients with Reduced and Mildly Reduced Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction: Intermediate Data from the FAR NHL Registry

  • Alžběta Trčková,
  • Lenka Špinarová,
  • Jindřich Špinar,
  • Jiří Pařenica,
  • Filip Málek,
  • Monika Špinarová,
  • Ondřej Ludka,
  • Jan Krejčí,
  • Jiří Jarkovský,
  • Klára Benešová,
  • Karel Lábr

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/app122110827
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 12, no. 21
p. 10827

Abstract

Read online

Introduction: We present the results of a study by the Pharmacology and NeuroHumoral Activation Registry (FAR NHL), which collects data on patients with chronic heart failure. The register contains 1088 patients from three workplaces in the Czech Republic which specialize in the care of patients with heart failure. Objectives: The aim was to obtain a comparison of pharmacotherapy and the incidence of comorbidities in patients with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) versus patients with mid-range (or newly mildly reduced) ejection fraction (HFmrEF). Methods: Patients with a baseline left ventricular ejection fraction below 50% were included and divided into HFrEF with EF below 40% and HFmrEF with EF 40–49%, according to the 2016 ESC Guidelines. In addition to the clinical condition, we also monitored laboratory parameters, comorbidities and pharmacotherapy in the patients. Results: Patients with HFrEF versus HFmrEF are more likely to be male (p p p p < 0.001), and also have a worse two-year prognosis. Conclusion: Compared to patients with HFmrEF, patients with HFrEF have more severe heart failure, more pronounced neurohumoral activation and a worse prognosis. They do not differ in the presence of comorbidities.

Keywords