Current Oncology (Feb 2021)

How Canadian Oncologists Use Oncotype DX for Treatment of Breast Cancer Patients

  • Xiaofu Zhu,
  • Susan Dent,
  • Lise Paquet,
  • Tinghua Zhang,
  • Daniel Tesolin,
  • Nadine Graham,
  • Olexiy Aseyev,
  • Xinni Song

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol28010077
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 28, no. 1
pp. 800 – 812

Abstract

Read online

Background: The literature suggests that medical oncologists differ on how they use the Oncotype DX (ODX) genomic assay for making decisions about systemic therapy in breast cancer patients. Given the emergence of data supporting the use of genomic profiling for the prognosis and predicting benefit of chemotherapy, we surveyed medical oncologists in Canada to assess their usage and perception of the ODX assay. Methods: A 34-item survey was distributed to Canadian medical oncologists via the Canadian Association of Medical Oncologists. Data was collected on physician demographics, ODX usage patterns, and physicians’ perception of the impact clinical and pathologic characteristics make on ODX utilization. Results: Response rate was 20.6% with 47 responses received from 228 survey sent. Forty-five responses were eligible for analysis. Sixty-two percent (28/45) of respondents treated predominantly breast cancer, and 60% (27/45) have been in practice for at least 10 years. The most cited reason for using ODX was to avoid giving patients unnecessary chemotherapy (64%; 29/45). Sixty-seven percent (30/45) deferred making treatment decisions until ODX testing was completed. Factors most strongly impacting ODX utilization included: patient request, medical comorbidities and tumor grade. In clinical scenarios, ODX was more frequently selected for patients aged 40–65 (vs. 65), grade 2 tumors (vs. grade 1 or 3), and Ki-67 index of 10–20% (vs. 20%). Conclusions: This survey demonstrated that Canadian medical oncologists are preferentially using ODX to avoid giving patients unnecessary chemotherapy. The utilization of ODX is mainly in patients with intermediate clinical and pathologic features.

Keywords