Small airways dysfunction: The importance of utilising Z-scores to define MMEF abnormalities in clinical practice

Abstract

Background: The small airways comprise the largest cross-sectional area of the lungs, however, assessing and reporting abnormalities for this region of the bronchial tree has been practically and scientifically uncertain. Methods: Using routinely collected spirometry data for patients with either asthma or COPD, the accuracy of % predicted values for defining small airways dysfunction was assessed. A z-score of ≤ −1.645 of the maximal-mid expiratory flow (MMEF) was used as the gold standard for defining abnormality in the small airways. Results: Records of 3396 patients were included in the analysis. The false positive (FP) rates were 24.6 %, 16.1 %, 11.5 %, or 7.9 % when the % predicted value of 80 %, 70 %, 65 %, or 60 % were used, respectively. Sex, age, and BMI were associated with FP rates. Males were more likely to be categorised as FP with odds ratio (OR) between 1.10 and 1.49 across % predicted groups. Age was associated with FP rates with an OR between 1.01 and 1.08. The BMI was also associated with FP rates with an OR of 1.03 across all % predicted groups. Assessing the association of age groups with FP rate showed that those above 60 years old were more likely to be categorised as FP with an OR between 1.23 and 73.2 compared to those less than 30 years old. Conclusion: When assessing the small airways in clinical practice or for scientific purposes, the % predicted values overestimate the actual impairment leading to FP interpretation. Utilising z-score values are recommended to assess the small airways using the spirometric index, MMEF.

Keywords

• Spirometry
• Z-score
• Standardised residual
• Small airways
• FEF25-75
• MMEF