The Planetary Science Journal (Jan 2021)

Six Outbursts of Comet 46P/Wirtanen

  • Michael S. P. Kelley,
  • Tony L. Farnham,
  • Jian-Yang Li,
  • Dennis Bodewits,
  • Colin Snodgrass,
  • Johannes Allen,
  • —,
  • Eric C. Bellm,
  • Michael W. Coughlin,
  • Andrew J. Drake,
  • Dmitry A. Duev,
  • Matthew J. Graham,
  • Thomas Kupfer,
  • Frank J. Masci,
  • Dan Reiley,
  • Richard Walters,
  • Zwicky Transient Facility Collaboration,
  • M. Dominik,
  • U. G. Jørgensen,
  • A. E. Andrews,
  • N. Bach-Møller,
  • V. Bozza,
  • M. J. Burgdorf,
  • J. Campbell-White,
  • S. Dib,
  • Y. I. Fujii,
  • T. C. Hinse,
  • M. Hundertmark,
  • E. Khalouei,
  • P. Longa-Peña,
  • M. Rabus,
  • S. Rahvar,
  • S. Sajadian,
  • J. Skottfelt,
  • J. Southworth,
  • J. Tregloan-Reed,
  • E. Unda-Sanzana,
  • MiNDSTEp Collaboration

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3847/PSJ/abfe11
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 2, no. 4
p. 131

Abstract

Read online

Cometary activity is a manifestation of sublimation-driven processes at the surface of nuclei. However, cometary outbursts may arise from other processes that are not necessarily driven by volatiles. In order to fully understand nuclear surfaces and their evolution, we must identify the causes of cometary outbursts. In that context, we present a study of mini-outbursts of comet 46P/Wirtanen. Six events are found in our long-term lightcurve of the comet around its perihelion passage in 2018. The apparent strengths range from −0.2 to −1.6 mag in a 5″ radius aperture and correspond to dust masses between ∼10 ^4 and 10 ^6 kg, but with large uncertainties due to the unknown grain size distributions. However, the nominal mass estimates are on the same order of magnitude as the mini-outbursts at comet 9P/Tempel 1 and 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko, events that were notably lacking at comet 103P/Hartley 2. We compare the frequency of outbursts at the four comets, and suggest that the surface of 46P has large-scale (∼10–100 m) roughness that is intermediate to that of 67P and 103P, if not similar to the latter. The strength of the outbursts appear to be correlated with time since the last event, but a physical interpretation with respect to solar insolation is lacking. We also examine Hubble Space Telescope images taken about two days following a near-perihelion outburst. No evidence for macroscopic ejecta was found in the image, with a limiting radius of about 2 m.

Keywords