BMC Family Practice (Aug 2017)

Prevalence of anal symptoms in general practice: a prospective study

  • Géraldine Tournu,
  • Laurent Abramowitz,
  • Camille Couffignal,
  • Frédéric Juguet,
  • Agnès Sénéjoux,
  • Stéphane Berger,
  • Anne-Laure Wiart,
  • Marc Bernard,
  • Françoise Provost,
  • Hélène Pillant-Le Moult,
  • Dominique Bouchard,
  • Jean-Pierre Aubert,
  • for the GREP study group,
  • for the MG-PREVAPROCT study group

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-017-0649-6
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 18, no. 1
pp. 1 – 7

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Anal disorders are largely underestimated in general practice. Studies have shown patients conceal anal symptoms leading to late diagnosis and treatment. Management by general practitioners is poorly described. The aim of this study is to assess the prevalence of anal symptoms and their management in general practice. Methods In this prospective, observational, national study set in France, all adult patients consulting their general practitioner during 2 days of consultation were included. Anal symptoms, whether spontaneously revealed or not, were systematically collected and assessed. For symptomatic patients, the obstacles to anal examination were evaluated. The general practitioner’s diagnosis was collected and a proctologist visit was systematically proposed in case of anal symptoms. If the proctologist was consulted, his or her diagnosis was collected. Results From October 2014 to April 2015, 1061 patients were included by 57 general practitioners. The prevalence of anal symptoms was 15.6% (95% CI: 14–18). However, 85% of these patients did not spontaneously share their symptoms with their doctors, despite a discomfort rating of 3 out of 10 (range 1–5). Although 65% of patients agreed to an anal examination, it was not proposed in 45% of cases with anal symptoms. Performing the examination was associated with a significantly higher diagnosis rate of 76% versus 20% (p < 0.001). Proctologist and general practitioner diagnoses were consistent in 14 out of 17 cases. Conclusions Patients’ concealed anal symptoms are significant in general practice despite the impact on quality of life. Anal examination is seldom done. Improved training of general practitioners is required to break the taboo.

Keywords