Comparative Cytogenetics (Sep 2024)

Different observers introduce not negligible biases in comparative karyomorphological studies

  • Lorenzo Peruzzi,
  • Jacopo Franzoni,
  • Manuel Tiburtini,
  • Emanuela Abidi,
  • Emiliano Alù,
  • Giulio Barone,
  • Elisabetta Bianchi,
  • Chiara Cataudella,
  • Emanuela Di Iorio,
  • Maria Guerrina,
  • Fabio Mondello,
  • Luca Paino,
  • Mario Pentassuglia,
  • Manuela Porrovecchio,
  • Giovanni Rivieccio,
  • Eugenia Siccardi,
  • Adriano Stinca,
  • Alessio Tei,
  • Virginia Volanti,
  • Antonio Giacò

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3897/compcytogen.18.135172
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 18
pp. 175 – 182

Abstract

Read online Read online Read online

Within a practical course of cytotaxonomy organized in Pisa (Italy) on February 2024 by the Group for Floristics, Systematics and Evolution of the Italian Botanical Society, we tested whether using image analysis softwares possible biases are still introduced by different observers. We conclude that observer bias selectively applies in possibly overestimating the length of short arms in a karyotype. As a consequence, the parameters most sensitive to these possible errors are CVCI and CVCL, and to a less degree MCA and THL. To achieve more stable results among observers, a still lacking standardized measurement protocol could be helpful.