Brain and Behavior (Jun 2024)

Rapid eye movement dependency is associated with increased inflammatory activity in obstructive sleep apnea syndrome

  • Asli Akyol Gurses,
  • Utku Ogan Akyildiz

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.3546
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 14, no. 6
pp. n/a – n/a

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Objective Rapid eye movement (REM)‐dependent obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) is a specific subtype of OSAS having some phenotypic characteristics like a preference for a younger age, female gender, and milder severity. Such favorable features could make it possible to consider an overall benign course for this phenotype. However, accumulating data introduced its association with several cardiometabolic and vascular disorders recently. The primary objective of this study was to address the disease from the inflammation perspective and evaluate the potential inflammatory status in this variant via two accessible blood parameters: platelet distribution width (PDW) and systemic immune‐inflammation index (SII). The secondary aim was to investigate whether this status, together with other disease characteristics, demonstrates consistency under different definitions of REM‐dependent OSAS published previously. Patients and methods The medical records of 35 patients with mild‐to‐moderate REM‐dependent OSAS, 35 age‐ and sex‐matched patients with REM‐independent OSAS, and 25 non‐OSA controls were retrospectively analyzed. Baseline features, polysomnographic characteristics, PDW, and SII were compared between the groups. Secondly, the analyses were repeated using different definitions of REM‐dependent OSAS. Bivariate analyses were performed, and a multiple stepwise regression model was applied to adjust for body mass index (BMI) and cardiovascular risk (CVR) factors. Results Mean PDW and SII were increased in patients with REM‐dependent OSAS as compared to non‐OSA controls (p = .022 and .029). The significance remained stable after adjustment for BMI and CVRs and was consistent according to different definitions. The Comparison of patients with REM‐independent OSAS and non‐OSA controls, as well as the two different subtypes of OSAS, did not yield significance. Conclusion Based on the current findings, patients with REM‐dependent OSAS appear to be susceptible to inflammation and should be carefully monitored for the negative consequences of that issue. To our knowledge, this study is the first to evaluate SII and PDW in REM‐dependent OSAS.

Keywords