Cancer Medicine (Aug 2023)

Development of a metabolite calculator for diagnosis of pancreatic cancer

  • Munseok Choi,
  • Minsu Park,
  • Sung Hwan Lee,
  • Min Jung Lee,
  • Young‐Ki Paik,
  • Sung Il Jang,
  • Dong Ki Lee,
  • Sang‐Guk Lee,
  • Chang Moo Kang

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.6233
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 12, no. 15
pp. 15933 – 15944

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19–9 is a known pancreatic cancer (PC) biomarker, but is not commonly used for general screening due to its low sensitivity and specificity. This study aimed to develop a serum metabolites‐based diagnostic calculator for detecting PC with high accuracy. Methods A targeted quantitative approach of direct flow injection‐tandem mass spectrometry combined with liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry was employed for metabolomic analysis of serum samples using an Absolute IDQ™ p180 kit. Integrated metabolomic analysis was performed on 241 pooled or individual serum samples collected from healthy donors and patients from nine disease groups, including chronic pancreatitis, PC, other cancers, and benign diseases. Orthogonal partial least squares discriminant analysis (OPLS‐DA) based on characteristics of 116 serum metabolites distinguished patients with PC from those with other diseases. Sparse partial least squares discriminant analysis (SPLS‐DA) was also performed, incorporating simultaneous dimension reduction and variable selection. Predictive performance between discrimination models was compared using a 2‐by‐2 contingency table of predicted probabilities obtained from the models and actual diagnoses. Results Predictive values obtained through OPLS‐DA for accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, balanced accuracy, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were 0.9825, 0.9916, 0.9870, 0.9866, and 0.9870, respectively. The number of metabolite candidates was narrowed to 76 for SPLS‐DA. The SPLS‐DA‐obtained predictive values for accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, balanced accuracy, and AUC were 0.9773, 0.9649, 0.9832, 0.9741, and 0.9741, respectively. Conclusions We successfully developed a 76 metabolome‐based diagnostic panel for detecting PC that demonstrated high diagnostic performance in differentiating PC from other diseases.

Keywords