Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (Nov 2023)

Conventional Adenomatous Polyps: Study of Histomorphological Features Using a Novel Scoring System

  • Anvita Nilekani,
  • BR Vani,
  • Asma Samreen,
  • V Srinivasa Murthy

DOI
https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/63039.18736
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 17, no. 11
pp. 23 – 27

Abstract

Read online

Introduction: Conventional adenomatous polyps are dysplastic proliferations that arise from the surface of the mucosa and grow in a top-down fashion. Dysplasia is graded as low-grade and high-grade using a two-tiered grading system. Aim: To grade the dysplasia in conventional adenomatous polyps by applying a novel scoring system. Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted in the Department of Pathology, ESIC Medical College and Post Graduate Institute of Medical Science and Research (PGIMSR), Rajajinagar, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India. A total of 46 cases reported as conventional adenomatous polyps were reviewed from January 2020 to June 2022. A cytological grading system was applied, evaluating eight parameters consisting of architectural and cytological features. Each parameter was scored, resulting in a total score ranging from 8 to 24. The final diagnosis was determined based on the histological pattern and the total cytological score. The results were tabulated in an excel sheet and analysed using mean, standard deviation, percentage, and frequency tables. The relationship between the independent variables was evaluated using the Chi-square test. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered significant. Results: Out of the 46 cases, most presented in the 4th decade of life 12 (32.61%) cases. The mean age of presentation was 54.56±11.91 years (mean±SD) with a male to female ratio of 1.4:1. The most common site was the sigmoid colon 17 (36.96%) cases. There were 26 cases of low-grade dysplasia with a mean score of 9.1 and 20 cases of high-grade dysplasia with a mean score of 15.2. The most common type was tubular adenoma with low-grade dysplasia 24 (52.17%) cases and a mean cytological score of 9. The high-grade dysplasia in tubular adenomas 7 (15.22%) cases, tubulovillous adenomas 11 (23.19%) cases, and villous adenomas 2 (4.35%) cases had mean scores of 13.3, 15.2, and 18, respectively. Conclusion: Dysplasia in adenomatous polyps is an independent risk factor for malignancy. The cytological scoring system helps in accurately diagnosing the grade of dysplasia and simplifies the process. The present study emphasizes the need for objective criteria, paving the way for implementing relevant surveillance and clinical protocols.

Keywords