Biogeosciences (Apr 2009)

Estimating the storage of anthropogenic carbon in the subtropical Indian Ocean: a comparison of five different approaches

  • M. Álvarez,
  • C. Lo Monaco,
  • T. Tanhua,
  • A. Yool,
  • A. Oschlies,
  • J. L. Bullister,
  • C. Goyet,
  • N. Metzl,
  • F. Touratier,
  • E. McDonagh,
  • H. L. Bryden

Journal volume & issue
Vol. 6, no. 4
pp. 681 – 703

Abstract

Read online

The subtropical Indian Ocean along 32&deg; S was for the first time simultaneously sampled in 2002 for inorganic carbon and transient tracers. The vertical distribution and inventory of anthropogenic carbon (C<sub>ANT</sub>) from five different methods: four data-base methods (ΔC*, TrOCA, TTD and IPSL) and a simulation from the OCCAM model are compared and discussed along with the observed CFC-12 and CCl<sub>4</sub> distributions. In the surface layer, where carbon-based methods are uncertain, TTD and OCCAM yield the same result (7&plusmn;0.2 molC m<sup>&minus;2</sup>), helping to specify the surface C<sub>ANT</sub> inventory. Below the mixed-layer, the comparison suggests that C<sub>ANT</sub> penetrates deeper and more uniformly into the Antarctic Intermediate Water layer limit than estimated from the much utilized ΔC* method. Significant CFC-12 and CCl<sub>4</sub> values are detected in bottom waters, associated with Antarctic Bottom Water. In this layer, except for ΔC* and OCCAM, the other methods detect significant C<sub>ANT</sub> values. Consequently, the lowest inventory is calculated using the ΔC* method (24&plusmn;2 molC m<sup>&minus;2</sup>) or OCCAM (24.4&plusmn;2.8 molC m<sup>&minus;2</sup>) while TrOCA, TTD, and IPSL lead to higher inventories (28.1&plusmn;2.2, 28.9&plusmn;2.3 and 30.8&plusmn;2.5 molC m<sup>&minus;2</sup> respectively). Overall and despite the uncertainties each method is evaluated using its relationship with tracers and the knowledge about water masses in the subtropical Indian Ocean. Along 32&deg; S our best estimate for the mean C<sub>ANT</sub> specific inventory is 28&plusmn;2 molC m<sup>&minus;2</sup>. Comparison exercises for data-based C<sub>ANT</sub> methods along with time-series or repeat sections analysis should help to identify strengths and caveats in the C<sub>ANT</sub> methods and to better constrain model simulations.